Why did you remove the traffic lights?

Dear Ferchino83,
why did you change a small section of this road way/534851262 from secondary to primary?

On way/422446417, what does "E8l" mean and why did you remove the name?

What is the source of the names you added or changed?

@chachafish - apologies, my mistake. Indeed I misread your examples as Ferchino83's excuse.

Meanwhile, the wiki has been clarified about junction=yes, that it is not meant for every junction.

You were citing cases were 4 traffic lights are mapped on the 4 joining nodes.
I was asking why you _removed_ such nodes from the junction.

Sorry I don't understand what a junction in Chicago has to do with the removal of traffic lights in this place here?

Dear Ferchino83, you have removed a traffic signal from node/264527964 on Jan 14, and one day after another user repaired it, you removed it again, without explanation. Why are you doing this?

Dear Ferchino83, why do you add "junction=yes" to junctions that do not have a name? This is not necessary.

In nodes 431368703 and 268906268 you removed the highway=traffic_signals. Why? OpenStreetCam images show that there are traffic lights.

Lieber sender171, es wäre wirklich sehr wünschenswert, wenn du uns erklärst, was du für Änderungen in den Kreislabels- und Relationen in der letzten Woche vorgenommen hast. Bei der ersten Durchsicht sehe ich auch gelöschte Tags.

Solltest du im Forum antworten, verlinke den Thread bitte hier.

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in changeset/62875161 and 62875241

Dear juhanjuku,
the Data Working Group became aware of this discussion. You say in comment #4 that you "have written permission from publisher to use Rother Wanderführer data on OSM.". This would be great news.

However, could you please _submit a copy of this permission_ to the Data Working Group, at <data@osmfoundation.org>, so we can check if it is compliant with OSM's license model.

Whether to map such routes in OSM can than be discussed separately.

Damage repaired; disputed tourism tag removed.