PlaneMad's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 97732142 | Keep up the great effort, the map of Nagarukhra looks amazing!! |
|
| 78024547 | Amazing work mapping around Golaghat! |
|
| 99031484 | Some streams are correct, but most are impossible since they would flow upwards and over mountains. You need to:
|
|
| 99143594 | Please check the streams, most of them are not following the topography and are crossing over mountains which are impossible. Please enable the OpenCycleMap background layer in Id to get contour details for reference. If you need help, please join the telegram group https://t.me/OSMIndia
|
|
| 98999684 | Due to the mountain slope, its impossible that there is standing water at this location. Please explain what you meant by snow lakes? |
|
| 98999738 | Is there a reason, the glacier was tagged as a lake? reverting now as there does not seem to be any evidence of this happening. |
|
| 52971095 | Wow, this is the most detailed mapping with field boundaries i have seen in India. Amazing work!! |
|
| 65702215 | It looks like SH 67 should actually be SH 22 according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state_highways_in_Madhya_Pradesh |
|
| 93676310 | Thanks for adding the bypass. Have completed the missing segments and aligned it to the latest imagery. Have also retagged it as under construction. Has it already been opened? |
|
| 95710952 | Should be visible if you zoom in since its under construction osm.org/#map=16/15.0740/77.6228 |
|
| 94190126 | Saw you removed the tags for NH 702A. Is this not the same road? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Highway_702A_(India) |
|
| 93623968 | Nice! Since it is a small population <10,000, it should be a village and not a city place=* |
|
| 93623752 | Wonderful, thanks for adding and welcome to OSM. This location was previously marked as a health subcentre, do you know where that should be located? https://osmcha.org/changesets/93623752 |
|
| 93085238 | Wonderful effort mapping all these villages. Curious about the use of localised tags like `place:ta` . Any specific reason to add them? |
|
| 92865066 | The goal for everyone has been to create India maps that we can fully translate into each Indic language https://github.com/osm-in/openstreetmap.in/issues/14, theres no question about not being proud of our own languages. By not following a common convention for the data, it makes it harder to reach this goal since data processing becomes more complex. Assuming you have read past discussion on the topic https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=720741#p720741 please propose a system that can work well for the whole country and not just for one state. To be clear, this is an open problem and its important to discuss with others to find a practical solution with best benefits. |
|
| 92865066 | Keep up the amazing mapping work around Tamil Nadu! With names, the accepted convention from past discussion is to keep the `name` tag in latin characters for data consistency. See osm.wiki/India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages for some background. Is there any specific reason for switching the name tags to Tamil script? |
|
| 92949628 | This changeset comment is fantastic. Kindly consider adding such wonderful details as a 'description' field on the object itself so its available as part of the map data. |
|
| 92843920 | Thank you and nice work improving the map. Is this edit organised as part of Mapathon Keralam? If so please use the #mapathonkerlam tag on you changeset as per osm.wiki/Mapathon_Keralam#Changesets |
|
| 92881132 | Thank you and nice work improving the map. Is this edit organised as part of Mapathon Keralam? If so please use the #mapathonkerlam tag on you changeset as per osm.wiki/Mapathon_Keralam#Changesets |
|
| 92875537 | Thank you and nice work improving the map. Is this edit organised as part of Mapathon Keralam? If so please use the #mapathonkerlam tag on you changeset as per osm.wiki/Mapathon_Keralam#Changesets |