Thanks for spotting, fixed.

Was updating Kalapani territory according to the new Nepal map https://assets-cdn.kathmandupost.com/uploads/source/news/2020/news/98353477_1682609495224206_5916763212010749952_o.jpg and noticed that the Kuthi Yankti river was renamed to Kali in this changeset.

While doing some research it seems like there are multiple references that establishes the river is called Kuthi Yankt, especially since the hamlet Kuthi also lies herei:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalapani_territory#Early_19th_century
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/96/1955-US-Army-map-Kali-river-sources.jpg/1280px-1955-US-Army-map-Kali-river-sources.jpg

It would be useful if you can share which part of Treaty of Sugauli claims this is the Kali River?

Made a few more fixes to revert the changes made changeset/85574373

Fantastic work with all the details. Map is looking beautiful!

Whoops, fixed!

Hi looks like you may have accidentally tagged whole of IIT campus to a park. Correcting it.

Hi, super work mapping Khorda!

Its been over 24 hours with the boundary relations not have been updated consistently across levels. Have reverted the change for now changeset/77083852
Feel free to share any evidence of on the ground change and we can make a proper update of all admin levels affecting the area.

The tiles have still not updated to the changed data upto z12. After z13 you can see the tiles reflect the updates made in this changeset.

Like you said, the data that was present was correct as per the OSMF guidelines on representing disputed territories, there was nothing to update unless there was some change on the ground regarding the control of the territory.

This changeset changed the Kalapani disputed territory to be within the Nepal relation from the de-facto situation of being within the India relation as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalapani_territory

The Nepalese claim line should exist just like the Indian claim lines on parts of Kashmir controlled by Pakistan and China relation/4610574

There has been recent media focus on this dispute which could be causing more people to look into this disputed area from both countries.

Hi Ro Sun, given that disputed boundaries are always an emotional issue between countries, i urge you to take a look at the OSMF policy regarding mapping these in a neutral way: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf

To my knowledge all sources indicate the territory is occupied by the ITBP since 1962. If you have any source of info that the area is under control of Nepal government, please document the link here, since a few more relations of subnational boundaries need updating as well.

If you are looking to create render a map that follows official Nepal maps, you might have to generate your own tile like what was done for India: @azaadshatru/diary/390300

Thanks for adding the corridor but NH703AA is for the road starting from Kapurthala connecting Goindwal Sahib and terminating near Taran Taran http://ddnews.gov.in/national/nh-no-703aa-punjab-named-guru-nanak-dev-ji-marg-gadkari

Making this correction to the road.

Fantastic work mapping Sakti. Looks beautiful!

Many thanks for a lot of the mapping in the area. While doing some cleanup, i merged the different sections of Rambagh Flyover and also removed many duplicated turn restriction relations that did not seem necessary.

From online reports it looks like the flyover is completely open, but maybe i could be wrong. If you have more info, please do check and make corrections if needed.

Have updated the tag to barrier:personnel which is more appropriate.

Hi Vineet, many thanks for mapping stores around IITB. Just made a bunch of updates including correcting the department_store tag to convenience which better descibes the small stores that are there.

Cann you share the map link of the location? i can see updated tiles on my end.

Nice work mapping Nagpur. Ive corrected some roads mistakenly tagged as a motorway.

Check in a private tab? you might be ssing cached tiles.

You are right, this was traced long back with low resolution landsat imagery which looked like a wetland but are just very well irrigated farmlands.

Updating it now, thanks.