Pieter Vander Vennet's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 179491437 | Hi, You added a playground (way/1486287556) in the middle of the a military domain (way/942760673) While this could be possible, it looks really weird to me. Is this correct? |
|
| 178417488 | Interesting use case Also interesting to see you going from barely using mapcomplete to having your own custom layer |
|
| 178229779 | Ben een beetje in een rabbit hole gevallen na het filmpje van Not Just Bikes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybFG-GyS_38) Ondertussen heb ik deze gemaakt: https://mapcomplete.org/theme.html?z=12.4&lat=52.37835540627992&lon=4.874599276777985&userlayout=https%3A%2F%2Fstudio.mapcomplete.org%2F3818858%2Fthemes%2Fplaygrounds%2Fplaygrounds.json&pitch=6# |
|
| 178244134 | (The described changes were made here https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/commit/54c580a0e84801f1eda6f5616d4a8b685987ac83) (They should be visible on https://dev.mapcomplete.org/hailhydrant in an hour and will flow to the production version when I feel like it, at most a few weeks) |
|
| 178244134 | Hi, The contributor used mapcomplete to add this data. See https://mapcomplete.org/hailhydrant.html I'm the maintainer of this tool (allthough I did not create the hydrant layer) If there are systematic input errors, these are because MapComplete suggests this. Feel free to hop into the issue tracker to discuss some of them, so we can fix them. I'm no expert in hydrants, so I need your knowledge for this. For example, I've moved the "hydrant type" question up; and will not ask the 'colour' for underground hydrants anymore. I'll also show that we assume that underground hydrants have 1 coupling; but the contributor can still override this or state this explicitly. (I'm not gonna budge on the 'units' though, see https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/issues/2511) Kind regards,
|
|
| 178229779 | Das de architect van de speeltuin |
|
| 176257428 | Hey, In je changeset heb je hier: crossing_ref=zebra toegevoegd. Ik heb actief (bijna) alle crossing_ref in Belgie opgekuist ten voordele van `crossing:markings=zebra`, omdat die een duidelijkere betekenis heeft. Zie osm.wiki/Proposal:Deprecating_crossing_ref voor wat er mis is met crossing_ref Je voegt ook `cycleway:both:lanes=exclusive` toe. Wat is hiervan de betekenis? Dit is iets dat volgens mij geen meerwaarde heeft t.o.v. cycleway:both=lane |
|
| 175085124 | 'cause I fucked up. I've removed the 'nobrand=yes' on the 9 instances where this occured. |