Hello.
You have placed the barriers directly on the SS301 second-class road. I don't know the exact situation on site, but shouldn't the barrier be somewhere on the old abandoned road? The barriers prevent planning along the SS301 second-class road at our Mapy.com. If the road is passable, can you move these two barriers a little to the side onto the old road?
Thank you,
Petr

Hello.
You have deleted several ways and nodes in this area. May I ask why? It seems very unlikely that paths have been removed in this location.
If this is an error, can you please revert this changeset back?

Hi. This change goes against this rules:
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
You shouldn't add second element with same tags just for sake of rendering in OsmAnd. In other apps it makes dupliticies.
Solution is to improve rendering in OsmAnd. I'm removing this node.

I agree and I've changed tagging to desert=erg.
Have a nice day.

Hello.
Desert=yes is not a useless tag. It is the only one of the other tags that refers to the Taklamakan Desert as a desert (a geographical term).
The tag natural=sand denotes an area covered by loose sand with no, or almost no, vegetation. However, this may not be a desert and is often used in other cases as well.
I have returned the tag desert=yes.

I didn't know that relations with natural=sand cannot have inner members. It does not make sense for me. But current state is better for me then previous one. Thanks a lot.

Hi.
For me is more important to have good data then good looking openstreetmap-carto style. Mapping for rendering is in my opinion not right.
On the other hand "natural=sand" is widledly used and lot of people is using this style.
I'm thinking that way around could be polygon with tag natural=sand and relaiton with one member (this polygon) with tags natural=desert, surface=sand desert=erg, wikidata and wikipedia. Name of desert should be in this case also part of relation, but than it wouldn't be rendered.

Hi.
OK. It is locally used like this and that is big argument.
But I still miss information about desert in tags. So I'm thinking about adding new tag desert=erg. It is ok for you?

Na změny uživatele Mamutinka co se týče nemocnic se podívám. Ale chtěl bych upozornit, že si stojíme za tím, že doplnit nemocnice tam, kde chybí, a to na základě veřejně dostupných zdrojů - například webových stránek samotných nemocnic - nepovažujeme za chybu. Je to podle nás hodnotný příspěvek do OSM.

Co se týče druhé poznámky, tak zde už nedokážu přesně zjistit, na co reagovat. Bod už v mapě není. Nemůžu než souhlasit, že plocha pro klášter je lepší než bod, pokud je nemocnice značená samostatnou plochou. Ale zpětně už posloupnost toho, jak změny v mapě vznikly, dohledat nedokážu.