I've found a few issues when looking at stuff on the ground.

Where the imported building doesn't exist on the ground (as a building):
note/5111776 - Basketball court
note/5111778 - Sculpture and plinth
note/5113979 - Entirely absent

Where an existing node for a shelter has been duplicated by a mapped building (roof) which duplicates it:
note/5111777

In the more complicated case of the duplication, it would be nice if it could be merged on import or something; I'm also unclear if we should map the shelter amentity as well as the building roof.

For the ones that exist on the ground but have been mistagged as a building, do we need to keep the LINZ ref to stop them being incorrectly reimported again? What happens for the entirely absent ones, as obviously that area needs deleting as there is nothing there.

Hi @retselkim,

Thanks for mapping these, it certainly makes them a lot easier to handle when on the ground, however a non-zero number of these were tagged as houses but are actually terraces/apartments (or two semi-detached houses mapped as one way, or actually one detached house) etc.

Would it make more sense to map these as residential if they are being done from aerial imagery, and then they can be re-tagged with a more accurate version when someone is onsite to check.
building=residential

I've added a second booth given there are actually a pair there.

Can you remember where the ref on the booth is in terms of which one is which?

I wonder if the ref field would be a better bet for tagging them?:
ref=*

Hi @paulchen-panther

Did you really intend to add some drinking water (curiously named in German) in central London? I couldn't see them on the surface either when I was in the area (although there is an underpass nearby).

Regardless of country, unless they are actually "named" drinking fountain, you'd be better off tagging that fact using fountain=* as then anyone (regardless of the language they speak) will be able to find that info).

Thanks for confirming, I've deleted your one and moved mine as it had a bit more info, and added some more from their website too, in changeset/166444451

Indeed the aerial imagery shows a wedge shaped building in the gap, I believe the cafe is in there.

Did I put node/12470289765 in the wrong place @Jmv61, or are there two adjacent cafes? I think I was a bit suspicious there was a missing building or something?

Thanks. I'll confess I've not been in the O2 Centre for ages, I simply go past it quite often.

Hi @flatroy ,

I noticed you erroneously created lots of extra JD Sports and Under Armour nodes using Every Door. If you have any more background/detail on what you did, I'm sure the developers would appreciate it. I've resolved the duplicates, but there's a note in their issue here:
https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/605#issuecomment-2746212344

Thanks for fixing the BoConcept duplication. I generally find it useful to convert a shop to vacant rather than deleting the node (unless a neighbour has increased in size or whatever) as then tools like StreetComplete will encourage a resurvey in future if/when it gets re-occupied.