OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
79772741

Added in 79781532

79778711

Is way/645285354 intended to have an addr:housenumber value?

79772741

It's rather building-like, so probably either that or another building inside the area

79462244

Maybe not "need", but yes

79462244

If the road exists, it should be on the map. Issues with rendering should be addressed by the renderer.

78723064

It's probably worth adding an `access:conditional` tag to express that

76473715

I assume by "the key" you're referring to name?

77471786

What is meant by "layer=1;3"?

75338359

To quote the wiki:
> Note that there are also areas called "national parks," "landscape parks," or similar that may be shortened to "park." Such large, national-level (and state- and provincial-level in North America) parks not so designed and manicured, but rather left in a more wild and natural state should not get this tag, instead, use another tag like boundary=national_park

77350933

service= should correspond to more broad types of service roads, perhaps drive-through would be correct here? If the road is covered, the covered portion should be tagged with covered=yes

77350874

Some sections of this road are still marked one-way, is that correct?

77285187

On the linked website:
The page title is "The Church In Boise"
The first sentence uses "The church in Boise, Idaho"
The address in the footer uses "The church in Boise"

77285187

The wiki for Key:name says it should usually be the "most prominent signposted name".

The sign on the building reads "a meeting place of the church in Boise", which seems more like a description than a name

77285187

but then again, they don't use it consistently and actually claim to not believe in names?

77285187

Regarding way/679643961: lowercase "church" appears to be the official name

76986850

Your changeset touched over 400 nodes and spans a few continents, this seems a little more than minor

76869325

Hi, welcome to OSM! I see you've created an area for Fred Meyer. There was already a point for it, you should remove that when replacing it. It would also be nice to have the parking lot tagged with an amenity=parking area.

76596936

What does this comment mean?

66338090

Is way/663558350 necessary? I assume the Pedestrian Area would cover routing here

76520444

ignore the nonsense source, this was submitted by a cat