The two nodes are so far apart that you should do it in two changes.

Sorry should be Hung Hom Road, but the edit itself is correct.

Next time do this in four changes, as the nodes are totally unrelated with, and far away from, each other

Next time do this in two changes, as the two nodes are totally unrelated with, and far away from, each other

Next time do not use one edit over such a large area. Thanks.

Next time do not use one edit over such a large area. Thanks.

Next time do not use one edit over such a large area. Thanks.

Next time do not use one edit over such a large area. Thanks.

You can't change a change set. I just said (precisely) what you should do if you meet a similar situation next time.

At least 10316133811 should be in a separate change.

You are right. I have realized it's recommendation from the editor. I have raised a discussion on Discord and Kovoschiz and others are finding out how this can be resolved.

Rest assured that I am not to reverse these changes.

One more thing, I recommend doing map object changes and relation changes in separate change sets unless the former inevitably leads to member change of the latter.

I have preset a tag set when I put in bus route relations or bus related objects, including network=九巴 KMB with network:en=KMB and network:zh=九巴. If you think I am wrong please go to Discord and publicly denounce me before arbitrarily changing the tags like this. Thanks.

This change seems to have made all bus route relations using way/1118631038 to mess up. To be specific, an ordering error occured as that way was put after way/709674368, which is south of it.

I do think that you should at least split into four changes, one in the Americas, one in Europe, one in Asia and one in Africa. Or, one change per language involved.

jOSM gave warning for various stuff tagging level=0 so I omitted them for the new objects I added in.

One more thing, though, two of the stops are not on a sawtooth.

Specifically:
1. The one immediately to the east of entrance E1, and
2. The 2nd on eastbound line west of entrance E1

Okay, rendering issue, I retract my question.

What? You undid all my paths?

It's inevitable that mapping needs to balance between factual description and what renders better. Here, rendering is a reason but not my primary reason. Accusing me for "mapping for the renderer" is not factual here -- I mean, I would not have done a survey if I do just that. I wanted to make sure what I did was factual (or to be precise, more factual) too.

On a side note, is there anywhere for me to complain Open Carto for overemphasizing roads and bus platforms?