OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
141155689

Reverted. That said, I *do* think tagging the type=building relation is more appropriate as it represents the whole building.

141109746

Fixed 12 bus route relations broken by this change through changeset/141137245

141109746

This change has broken at least 5 bus routes.

140985684

No need to spare space for me, and I have a few routes to do before even reaching 30 / 30X. You could do 40A / 40P or any other route as you like

140985684

And why do you delete node/11169109993? (I didn't delete the nodes you created even if they are redundant)

140985684

Maybe we should communicate more on what route we are doing next. I follow numbers (1-29, 203C-224X, prefixed Kowloon routes; after that I will move to 30-49X, 230X-249X, etc.), but you seem to add routes randomly or by area so I don't have idea of what you'll do next.

140985684

Not sure why you created another stop position at Wai Lok Street 2 hours after I edited that area. I have merged the stop area in changeset/140991528.

140539558

I had moved the node and re-routed the routes to make them consistent for now in changeset/140857575

140539558

Okay I found some official notice which probably supports your change to Mong Kok Road. However, you did it in a very crude way, not even bothering to tidy up the bus routes involved in that section. Please at least move the bus stop position nodes and re-route the involved bus routes. And try not to bundle so many changes in one place. I think you are already editing more than you can handle.

140781010

The following google streetview seems to support a cliff (slope) IMHO, and it could be seen as separate from the retaining wall added added by GSF1200S:

https://www.google.com/maps/@22.3809124,114.2187158,3a,75y,283.84h,95.65t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sL8785JeCnX8AZkdXIWcf4w!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DL8785JeCnX8AZkdXIWcf4w%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D40.854336%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

140781010

@Kovoschiz

"Someone else having added it" does not necessarily mean it's correct or up-to-date. I even repurpose Kaart Ground Survey nodes wherever I found them outdated or wrong -- they are supposed to be professionals.

That said, natural=cliff isn't the most intuitive tag here. I had exchanged a few private message with GSF1200S and shared my findings on why at least some editors would think that cliff should be depicted as such.

140539558

If that section of road was closed bus companies would have issued notice on bus stop re-location, but I didn't find any. Are you sure you are right?

140781010

@Kovoschiz apparently he ignored you and re-did the change (as 140826962)

140826962

Did you know Kovoschiz reverted your change yeaterday and added a reason? Did you read it?

140527438

While adding one stop_position per bus_stop is preferable, some of them are close to each other and bear the same name that only one stop_position is required. Moon Lok Dai Ha, for example, needs only one stop_position.

140232531

You turned one of the KMB stop to Citybus and place a new KMB one as replacement. The problem is, that stop is occupied (by KMB 3C). Either you also edit the relation, or you undo the edit if it's taken over by mistake.

I have done a minor reversion on this at change 140661070.

changeset/140661070

140376620

https://streetcomplete.app/

I just fooled around a while ago because I found something worth uploading on the streets. Seriously, though, I think it's better to organize the result of a survey and do a serious edit accordingly

140376620

A mobile app for lazy people to do small edits here and there

140376620

FYI

https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2022/chinese/subleg/negative/2022ln118-c.pdf

https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2022/english/subleg/negative/2022ln118-e.pdf

140376620

Contrary to X89D (which is separate), X42C is NOT