Palgrave Peter's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 166583571 | Ham Street Wood NNR boundary redefined based on map in pdf here https://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/6354351366864896?category=6287533486899200 |
|
| 159489019 | Thanks for spotting this. I will look for further errors and correct. |
|
| 159320596 | Ok, thanks. I'll get it right next time! |
|
| 147126500 | Having thought about it, I reckon that although its a wide pavement, its no more than that, so I have changed it accordingly. |
|
| 152422436 | Thanks for the tip off. I've fixed the gap over the Vigo Sprong now so the path is continuous, though I don't remember changing anything there the other day. |
|
| 147319499 | Way: 576967371 looks rather odd. Does the place have a name? |
|
| 144944046 | Hi, Thanks for this info. I thought I'd only made a few errors like this, but it was lots! All corrected now. |
|
| 147323958 | One side of the A249 looks to be in the wrong place now? |
|
| 144598662 | Actually the surface is gravel, so I have corrected it. |
|
| 124424683 | You're right and I've fixed it now. |
|
| 136778885 | Thanks for pointing this out, I will need to be more careful in teh future. |
|
| 133132009 | Done. Thanks for letting me know. I have a new mouse and it takes getting used to! |
|
| 128987834 | Dave,
Also they looked like station buildings when I visited. |
|
| 126388761 | Thanks for the URL. I can see this is a contested point, but the suggestion to leave a space is one I will tend to adopt, at least for non-residential roads. |
|
| 92716302 | Thanks - how did you find them as I cant see a way to do it? |
|
| 92716302 | Yes it should be openplaques:id. Thanks for spotting the typo. |
|
| 91115075 | Ok, that looks like a good idea. |
|
| 89758990 | Thanks for making the corrections. I am using the iD editor which seems to be difficult to use with layers and levels. |
|
| 90308805 | Sorry, I cant help much here as I'm only adding collection times. I don't actually know where one can check on the ref no. |
|
| 87857456 | Yes I'm new to this and my enthusiasm got the better of me - this was a stupid mistake. Can you correct it for me? |