Fixed.

I'm not sure this is standard tagging for parking lots- while yes parking is used by pedestrians I believe highway=pedestrian should be used for only pedestrian-oriented areas. amenity=parking areas are built for cars, not pedestrians.

I believe most data consumers also already understand amenity=parking to implicitly allow pedestrians anyways.

Looked at some older imagery and found that this was indeed the case- last evidence for a filled pond was 2006, dry in 2007 and does not appear on any local imagery since

National parks are not tagged as leisure=park. Take a look at some of the other national parks in the US for examples of tagging

boundary=national_park

I know JOSM botched this one and only uploaded nodes, reverting ASAP

I feel like we need to have a community discussion for the tagging schema in Virginia before edit warring over this. The primary tagging schema in the US appears to be natural=wood rather than landuse=forest.

I've been mapping forest south around Roanoke/Lynchburg using natural=wood for forest that might technically be managed, but clearly not used for lumber. landuse=forest would be for visibly man-made sections of forest.

landuse=forest around the legal boundaries seems unnecessary- renderers already ignore the distinction between the two.

You're free to join the discussion in the OSMUS slack.

I'm aware this upload has an error. I'm fixing it ASAP.

I'm aware this upload has an error. I'm fixing it ASAP.

I'm aware this upload has an error. I'm fixing it ASAP.

I'm aware this upload has an error. I'm fixing it ASAP.

Thanks! VA has a slightly higher resolution landcover raster layer available than the national set so I've been using it as a guide (cross referencing with aerial of course)

The error has been fixed. changeset/113653075

Wolf Pitt Road references removed - Campbell County Gov has no listing for Wolf Pitt Road and as far as I can find on street level imagery there is no signposting for it