OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
70630209

again, you did not check the keys on those roads where you incorrectly added blocks, that do not exist. I'm not editing an incorrect edit, that makes no sense. You done more damage than good, i explained that and the lack of offset adjustment and all of a sudden, without reason you are playing the victim and accusing me of being xenophobic. Again, there's no such thing as "geometrical aberration". Respect local knowledge and stop being arrogant.

70630209

First of all, i didn't call you a noob. You need to respect local knowledge without taking for grant that you are a guru and start wrongly editing and adding incorrect data. I mentioned you did not align satellite imagery. And by your reaction i see you are aware of it, but none the less, decided to misalign the data. This is only satellite imagery, we do not have ortophotos from planes. There's no geometrical aberration on the data, only on the imagery. Actually there's is plenty of reference data to take. Again, thank you for classifying OpenStreetMap as "horrible". I have no issues with foreigners, you just seem to ditch local knowledge over arm-chair mapping, when its the other way around.

70630209

you need to calm down. i didn't erase, i reverted as explained on the previous changeset. As said on that changeset you misaligned the data, because you didn't align the satellite imagery offset. Your edits on Santana, which only the values were kept as the geometry were all misaligned have been added to OSM.

70630209

partially reverted

70632081

Viva, pode explicar a razão de ter adicionado bancos como áreas? a geometria correta para bancos são pontos e não áreas.
Mais o reservatório do Monte não é de todo natural mas manmade.
A ilha de tráfego do estacionamento do Monte também não é um park.

Aguardo justificações

70614435

About your opinion "the map is horrible in madere" it's quite disrespectful towards the contributors as the map contains high quality data that you won't find in other map.

70614435

Reverted

70614435

hello, can you explain why you added block on the old ER 101 between São Vicente and Porto Moniz? there's a permissive access on those via chain. I also advice you to read about the satellite imagery offset, the edit you done on this changeset in Ribeira Brava is completely wrong. You actually misaligned the data, not correct it

70532109

hi Daniel, for the levada you should use the tag waterway=canal and usage=irrigation

70494004

can you explain why you added a ford here? doesn't make sense

70494246

will revert this changeset. you modified the geometry of the legal administrative boundaries.

70504546

why was this deleted?

70504636

again, not keeping the oldest element in OSM.

70505516

why did you delete Pico do Larano?

70505731

hi, can you explain these changes you are doing? you are not keeping the oldest element in OSM

70204457

you kept editing and declined replying to this edit. will revert these incorrect changesets

70197633

ok, ausência de explicação. Edição removida.

70232065

thanks for cleaning these. my bad. didn't notice they were duplicated and not actually updating them.

70197633

Pode explicar o motivo desta edição?
Alterou a etiqueta de um ponto para edíficio. A localização da Secretaria Regional do Ambiente e Recursos Naturais é neste edificio que é partilhado com a Secretaria Regional de Equipamentos e Infraestruturas.

70204457

hello, can you explain why you remove the tag:usage=irrigation
waterway=canal
?