NunoCapeloCaldeira's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 70630209 | again, you did not check the keys on those roads where you incorrectly added blocks, that do not exist. I'm not editing an incorrect edit, that makes no sense. You done more damage than good, i explained that and the lack of offset adjustment and all of a sudden, without reason you are playing the victim and accusing me of being xenophobic. Again, there's no such thing as "geometrical aberration". Respect local knowledge and stop being arrogant. |
|
| 70630209 | First of all, i didn't call you a noob. You need to respect local knowledge without taking for grant that you are a guru and start wrongly editing and adding incorrect data. I mentioned you did not align satellite imagery. And by your reaction i see you are aware of it, but none the less, decided to misalign the data. This is only satellite imagery, we do not have ortophotos from planes. There's no geometrical aberration on the data, only on the imagery. Actually there's is plenty of reference data to take. Again, thank you for classifying OpenStreetMap as "horrible". I have no issues with foreigners, you just seem to ditch local knowledge over arm-chair mapping, when its the other way around. |
|
| 70630209 | you need to calm down. i didn't erase, i reverted as explained on the previous changeset. As said on that changeset you misaligned the data, because you didn't align the satellite imagery offset. Your edits on Santana, which only the values were kept as the geometry were all misaligned have been added to OSM. |
|
| 70630209 | partially reverted |
|
| 70632081 | Viva, pode explicar a razão de ter adicionado bancos como áreas? a geometria correta para bancos são pontos e não áreas.
Aguardo justificações |
|
| 70614435 | About your opinion "the map is horrible in madere" it's quite disrespectful towards the contributors as the map contains high quality data that you won't find in other map. |
|
| 70614435 | Reverted |
|
| 70614435 | hello, can you explain why you added block on the old ER 101 between São Vicente and Porto Moniz? there's a permissive access on those via chain. I also advice you to read about the satellite imagery offset, the edit you done on this changeset in Ribeira Brava is completely wrong. You actually misaligned the data, not correct it |
|
| 70532109 | hi Daniel, for the levada you should use the tag waterway=canal and usage=irrigation |
|
| 70494004 | can you explain why you added a ford here? doesn't make sense |
|
| 70494246 | will revert this changeset. you modified the geometry of the legal administrative boundaries. |
|
| 70504546 | why was this deleted? |
|
| 70504636 | again, not keeping the oldest element in OSM. |
|
| 70505516 | why did you delete Pico do Larano? |
|
| 70505731 | hi, can you explain these changes you are doing? you are not keeping the oldest element in OSM |
|
| 70204457 | you kept editing and declined replying to this edit. will revert these incorrect changesets |
|
| 70197633 | ok, ausência de explicação. Edição removida. |
|
| 70232065 | thanks for cleaning these. my bad. didn't notice they were duplicated and not actually updating them. |
|
| 70197633 | Pode explicar o motivo desta edição?
|
|
| 70204457 | hello, can you explain why you remove the tag:usage=irrigation
|