Nu gik jeg forbi i dag for at være helt sikker. Vejen var tagget som maxspeed=50, maxspeed:advisory=30, hvilket stadig er korrekt. De blå firkantede skilte angiver ikke hastighedsbegrænsninger, men anbefalede hastigheder.

Så undlad venligt at ændre hastighedsgrænser, som er korrekte.

Hej.
Tal i OSM bruger punktum som decimalskilletegn.

Dvs. width=1.5 (ikke 1,5)

Brug venligst standardværdier for farver.

Dvs, fx.
colour=green i
og ikke "grøn "

Brug venligst standardværdier for farver, dvs colour=red og ikke "Rød"

hvad er TURTLE?
Der skal være et fysisk tag.

Og undlad at sætte "access=yes"
på veje, stier og trapper.

For det indikerer at fx fx biler kan køre på dem.

Hej,
Husk at for tal bruges punktum som decimaltegn.

Dvs fx with=1.5 og ikke "1,5".

Venligst brug standardværdier for farver.

Fx white i stedet for "Hvid".

Se:
colour=*

Tak, jeg var faktisk ikke sikker.
Det kunne have været en sti eller et blomsterbed eller sådan noget.

Hvad er Vandmynten for noget?

Tak, rettet

Tak for det.
Jeg må have glemt at tagge Kirkendrup Hundeskov som hundeskov. Og dejligt at andre også tagger hundeskove. Det er noget jeg selv bruger.

What it the source of the maxwidth=2 ?

It looks much wider on the PDOK aerials and on the Mapillary images. Also on Mapillary there is a trailer parked between the two maxwidth=2 that looks to be wider than 2m.

We are not mapping legal definitions.

And that would extremely difficult. I do not know the French laws and regulations. But in Denmark many caravan sites are considered camping sites according to the camping regulations, even if tents are not allowed. But that depends on whether the parking (but not services) is commercial, the number of plots (less than 4 on farms is usually not camping, permits, exceptions etc).
In fact stellplatz's are normally considered camping in Denmark. The 450 CAMPING-CAR PARK sites would legally be camp sites in Denmark even if most of them only accepts motorhomes and not tents.

What matters for data consumers/users is whether it is a place for motorhomes or a camping site. There can be some grey ares, but then we pick the best match.

And btw we have the same issue with tourism=chalet many of which are incorrectly tagged as tourism=camp_site even if you cannot use our own tent, caravans or RV's.

The wiki for caravan_site says:

==
They may also have some space for tents. If a site is primarily for tents, it should be tagged as tourism=camp_site. If tents are allowed on a site it should be tagged with tents=yes.
==

And the site is tagged with tents=yes.

It is operated by https://www.campingcarpark.com/fr_FR/
Which on it website presents itself as:

"CAMPING-CAR PARK, the 1st European network of stopover sites and services areas"

On the website it says that it is open for motorhomes all year, and can take tents and caravans in the high season.

On the aerial images I can see only motorhomes

So I am sure that it is a caravan_site.

I am very open to suggestions for tagging this better.

I take "fee" to indicate whether a motorhome can stay overnight for free.

But you might have to pay for electricity, water, wastewater disposal, etc.

I try to tag this when I know it. But sometimes I just have e.g., a tourism website that says that you have to pay for services without specifying which services there are at the site and which of them you have to pay for. Sometimes you have to pay for all of them. Sometimes you have to pay for electricity, sometimes for both electricity and water. So I tag it with service:fee=yes.

Hopefully someone visiting a caravan_site will replace it with more specific tags.

Thank you, fixed

Thank you, fixed

weighbridge is spelled without a "t".
I have fixed it.

Tak, rettet.