See: www.openstreetmap.org/way/14642451
I believe you need to break these segments out and add a bridge=yes separately. And then just make sure you keep them in the route relation.

I know only enough ancient greek right now to be a danger. ;-)

I'm sticking with name, because the greek characters are the only actual signs on the buildings.

Good call with the alt_names. Is there something like a tag for name:english?

I know I have one of those wrong (I think it was actually a Tau and not a Theta for one of them), but I'm on campus now so I'll check in a minute and correct it!

Is it in the future if the infrastructure is already finished and in place? Or should it be a route relation (presumed active) that brings the stop into existence?

Can a bus stop exist without a bus? Would it matter if that bus were in the past or the future? Would it demand a location between both?

I'm not really asking so much as having fun with ontology. Your tagging is probably more correct :-)

Ha! I was trying to edit on my phone while I waited for the dentist. Took me 15 minutes to add that stupid hat shop.

Ah! Looks like it's already fixed. My tiles just hadn't updated.

Well of course there is a page just about that...

To be honest, I'm not sure why boundaries exist in OSM if they can't be related to a real feature... but I bet there's a page just for that dicussion already too.

Is there an easy way to fix it? Or does it need to be reverted somehow?