Please check relations when editing

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.90600&lat=33.79135&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Project information: osm.wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA

Updated 19 existing PTv2 routes to match latest August service change. Modified several train/bus transportation centers. Modified dozens of bus stop positions.

Is construction here completed? If so the tags for buildings, roads, and footpaths should probably be updated to no longer be tagged with construction

Please make sure that when road geometry is modified that the PTv2 routes are maintained.

Thank you.

QA tool: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.86285&lat=33.83573&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard

Thanks for your concern DwarfNebula_ but I’m the one who spearheaded the “new” amenity=towing_service to begin with. Just a few weeks ago world wide usage of it was 1. I got it up to about 60 by hand. Now that the consensus is to drop “_service” I’ll just do that because every instance of it was something I previously modified and verified.

did you even look? way/1214074604

Sorry dude just editing in this area and I saw how terrible those commercial building traces are. Honestly you shouldn't have even imported them

Looks like you accidently set the area as a building. I've fixed it for you: changeset/165396136

osm.wiki/JOSM

I saw you made multiple edits to add to this relation. For big relations I highly recommend you check out JOSM! It makes relation editing very easy and quick.

100th edit 🎉

Hi, just letting you know that for PTv2 routes you should not be using the forward role on any of the members. I don't care if you mangle up the older PTv1 routes, those will be fully redone at a later time.

I recommend reviewing this website after your edits:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.82266&lat=33.66391&zoom=17

It usually updates once a day.

Thank you for resolving this changeset and 160348244. I appreciate it.

Thank you for checking and fixing it! I appreciate it.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.49171&lat=34.06579&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.51&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Hi, when adding the change:lanes, it would be recommended to split the existing way to maintain the routes.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.30466&lat=33.09804&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.51&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

I’m responsible for gradually upgrading the decade old routes to the new version (and the import of all the bus stops). However, every PTv2 route is correctly mapped and should be trivially easy to update in the JOSM editor as you update the intersections.

Please maintain those routes when modifying road geometry, it makes life a lot easier. I don’t care if you mess up the old PTv1 routes, those are mangled beyond repair.

Hi, please check bus routes when modifying road geometry. You ended up breaking route 60.

way/405517305 for example

By merging the dual carriageway you broke the bus routing. Please keep routes in mind when you modify roads.