Hæ ég lagaði uppsetningin á opnunartímarnir :-)

Ok thanks. Is "refinement" generally understood in the community to mean changes suggested by and/or inspired by a validator ( JOSM, getright etc) ?

What sort of refinement ?
Covering that many ways and nodes, I think it might matter :- )

Ok, cool. I totally agree by the way that it was unnecessary to put the tag bicycle=yes on all the sidewalks / pavements. However the primary shared paths should definitely have the tag.

I wish this change could be reverted.
Bicycle routing is not working without the tag bicycle=yes.
The combined paths were tagged according to the wiki page on the Icelandic Openstreeetmap bicycle project, and seem to agree with the conventions if the interface "Bicycle tags"
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~ligfietser/fiets/index.html?map=route&zoom=15&lat=64.15324&lon=-21.74192&layers=B00000FFFFFFFFFFTFFFF

Hi are those really 4 bicycel repair stations ?
amenity=bicycle_repair_station
Could they be bicycle repair shops instead, as they are placed inside houses ?
Hilsen Morten (Kan svare på norsk)

What kind of fix ?
How can I (not quite a novice) see a list of changes in this changeset that pertain to Iceland or Reykjavik ?

north-side :-)

May I ask why / what kind of changes were reverted ? And did you revert a mistake, or perhaps vandalism...

Best Regards,
Morten

Great, thanks - on behalf of myself and I imagine, on behalf of as it were, a more harmonised/unified tagging of bicycle counters.

Perhaps add description here : osm.wiki/Bicycle ?

Hi hanoj,
I see you have been changing many bicycle-counter points. I guess the aim is to have a unified way of tagging them. Is there a blog post, wiki text or similar outlining choices made and the the rationale for them ?
Best Regards,
Morten

Hello,
Great to get more natural features mapped. But your changes are to add Russian names to the features ? A comment on that when committing changes would have been great. I am also a little curious about which source has been used.
Best Regards, Morten