Some OSM tags go in a direction that doesn't correspond to any usage elsewhere. For example, there is not a 1:1 translation from the US Highway Functional Classification system and the OSM highway tagging conventions. place=neighborhood seems to be such a tag. I'd recommend not removing marked neighborhoods for now, but if there is a better replacement in the future, just change those that should be changed to the new tag at that time.

There is a mix of opinions - more discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2020-September/020621.html

These subdivisions are already marked inside a landuse area and there is no ambiguity about where the place tag applies. There are many thousands of such subdivisions already tagged this way in OSM.
Nodes marked as 'place' however do introduce name association in other unincorporated parts of the county.

Hi, these subdivisions were not tagged as place=suburb , but instead using the suggested place=neighborhood. Why were the place tags removed? osm.wiki/Neighbourhood

https://www.facebook.com/Reubenswings/

Hi, I jumped the gun and changed this to Rueben's before the actual changeover which will happen on September 22. I haven't worried too much about being too early because the OSM map and OSMand are the only apps that update instantly. Most OSM map consumers only update between monthly to annually.

Hi, thank you for this edit. The building is more than a bit confusing: bus depot on the bottom floor and a parking area for cars on the roof. I'll try to update it to better match what is on the ground.

Again, please do not delete the lake waterbody to create a golf course

Why do you keep deleting Lake Keowee? If you don't recognize something, please don't delete it.

Hi, Please take care before deleting objects. This change appears to have broken both Lake Keowee and Keowee-Toxaway State park.

Welcome to OSM! Please use meaningful changeset comments: - does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The turning circle for Crimson Court was accidentally dragged to Batesville road, so I restored it.

The best way to add details to a building is not to delete the previous building because it may already contain much information such as address or 3D tagging. Instead, grab the middle of a wall where more detail is needed and drag it to match the imagery. Repeat until the new building feature is defined. Then press Q to square the resulting building.

Welcome to OSM! The reason for many of the warnings were that the large landuse area (residential) was changed to building=apartments. Also, buildings do not need a name 'apartment' since the building type has been set to 'apartments'

Also, Red Bowl was set to layer -1: is it in the basement?

Hi, This Joe's Crab Shack has closed and all signage removed.

Hi @Srihari Thalla , I believe those TIGER tags were automatically removed by the editor, as the community decided they were no longer needed.

Welcome to OSM! Are you familiar with this area today? There is newer imagery - check the "Background settings" , then check the "National Agriculture Imagery program". The original edits were recently put it by a local mapper. Would you like us to restore the original values or do you wish to correct?

The latest imagery varies by location and is often challenging to keep up with.

Hi, great progress in Shelby! Normally in OSM, land uses are not connected directly to roads because they do not extend to the centerline of the highway. In some areas there may be a gap between the edge of land use and road in the default map rendering, but this is only because road widths are not drawn to scale in the current default map.

Yes, it may be deleted when the default imagery layer is updated - depending on whether the date the imagery was taken is newer than the last edit date of the object being deleted. I've gotten GPS coordinates of a road inside a construction area and used that to create a street under construction which wouldn't show on the newest imagery. Probably not a big deal, but way/781660324 was one that came up as source=survey in March.