Thanks Marc, now corrected

Thanks Marc for updating. If you see what are very obvious(?) typos that make no impact, feel free to just change them. I do reply to comments but only when I have free time. I know you mean well but you on the borderline between being helpful and being offensive.
Cheers,
Mike

Hi Marc,
No information is lost and the editting is done from on the ground survey. In the Philippine example, the imagery is very much out of date and you have tagged as "orchard" ground that has been cleared and used for accommodation by two entities, several building with no clear boundary between them and probable shared usage.

Hi Marc,
Thank you for getting in touch. No, it is a user defined value by me as there is nothing that overlaps it. I find it very useful for making maps of resort / beach areas to show and demarcate the often customer-only areas of hotels. Taginfo suggests that many have been removed.

Happy mapping,
Mike

Yes, your summise correct. Corrected now. Thanks for pointing out.

Yep! Fixed now. Thanks Mateusz

Not visited by me. Given its location, I'd guess that phodgkin is right in that it was not an obviously visible "trig point" but either bench mark or simple spot height. He also seems to have actually visited the area looking at other nearby edits.

Andy, corrected now ("barn"). Thanks. Mike