Mateusz Konieczny's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by Mateusz Konieczny
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5160358 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/1114875159/history has shop = landscaping shop=landscaping ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it selling landscaping supplies? Or is it office of someone providing landscaping services? Or is it something else? |
|||
| 5163160 | Mateusz Konieczny | would shop=growshop tagging fit for node/11060578312/history ? |
|||
| 5163159 | Mateusz Konieczny |
is it a factory? shop? office? (asked on changeset/159959169 and got ignored) |
|||
| 5161576 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/58755551/history has shop = plaza shop=plaza ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from shop=* or osm.wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else? |
|||
| 5162113 | Mateusz Konieczny | mtb:scale:uphill=-3
Maybe
I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
|||
| 5162054 | Mateusz Konieczny | mtb:scale:uphill=-3
Maybe
I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
|||
| 5161974 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/563461620/history is tagged as building = proposed Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here. |
|||
| 5151112 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/502682850/history has roof_shape = flat Maybe roof:shape=flat was intended here? See roof:shape=* |
|||
| 4059720 | Mateusz Konieczny |
amenity=self_storage ? Is it simply a shop=storage_rental? See osm.wiki/Tag:shop%253Dstorage_rental Or is it selling boxes/packaging? If it is certainly shop=storage_rental - would it be safe to mass-retag it without inspecting individual cases for all objects tagged this way? |
|||
| 4469193 | Mateusz Konieczny |
what kind of healthcare amenity is here? |