Mateusz Konieczny's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by Mateusz Konieczny
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5080884 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/625364973/history has source:maxgcweight = PL:sign_B-18 B-18 to chyba jest znak dotyczący masy rzeczywistej? nie maksymalnej masy dopuszczalnej? Więc tu chyba zwyczajne maxweight (i source:maxweight) powinno być? |
|||
| 4223845 | Mateusz Konieczny |
that is rather shelter_type=gazebo, right? see shelter_type=* |
|||
| 4895944 | Mateusz Konieczny |
maxspeed:type=PL:urban a maxspeed podany inny niż 50 - to jest to teren zabudowany bez innych znaków czy coś innego? |
|||
| 5181937 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/22678789/history - are pedestrians really banned from walking there? there is access=agricultural tag without foot tag maybe it should be changed to
or vehicle=agricultural if it is for vehicles in general (it is already marked as accessible to cyclists, bicycle= overrides more general access tags) maybe access tagging here is just altogether wrong? |
|||
| 3537112 | Mateusz Konieczny |
is it still an active construction site? |
|||
| 5181953 | Mateusz Konieczny | node/23657903/historytourism=hostel combined with guest_house= is quite surprising. What is going on here? Is it tourism=guest_house? Is guest_house= not needed and should be removed? |
|||
| 5181952 | Mateusz Konieczny | node/23656558/historytourism=hostel combined with guest_house= is quite surprising. What is going on here? Is it tourism=guest_house? Is guest_house= not needed and should be removed? |
|||
| 5181941 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/22955565/history - are pedestrians really banned from walking there? there is access=agricultural tag without foot tag maybe it should be changed to
or vehicle=agricultural if it is for vehicles in general (it is already marked as accessible to cyclists, bicycle= overrides more general access tags) maybe access tagging here is just altogether wrong? |
|||
| 5181940 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/22791599/history - are pedestrians really banned from walking there? there is access=agricultural tag without foot tag maybe it should be changed to
or vehicle=agricultural if it is for vehicles in general (it is already marked as accessible to cyclists, bicycle= overrides more general access tags) maybe access tagging here is just altogether wrong? |
|||
| 5181938 | Mateusz Konieczny | way/22745134/history - are pedestrians really banned from walking there? there is access=agricultural tag without foot tag maybe it should be changed to
or vehicle=agricultural if it is for vehicles in general (it is already marked as accessible to cyclists, bicycle= overrides more general access tags) maybe access tagging here is just altogether wrong? |