Even if that would be true, you have no right to change other user’s data. No tags are forbidden even deprecated. And you were not acting from power of DWG.

Status quo is counties at admin_level=6, as they were for last 10 years. And COGs as admin_level=5 as I originally created those data. If not I will have to escalate this issue.

Status quo is counties at admin_level=6, as they were for last 10 years. And COGs as admin_level=5 as I originally created those data. If not I will have to escalate this issue.

Status quo is counties at admin_level=6, as they were for last 10 years. And COGs as admin_level=5 as I originally created those data. If not I will have to escalate this issue.

Status quo is counties at admin_level=6, as they were for last 10 years. And COGs as admin_level=5 as I originally created those data. If not I will have to escalate this issue.

Status quo is counties at admin_level=6, as they were for last 10 years. And COGs as admin_level=5 as I originally created those data. If not I will have to escalate this issue.

These are undiscussed and unapproved mass changes. Please revert back to previous state.

These are undiscussed and unapproved mass changes. Please revert back to previous state.

These are undiscussed and unapproved mass changes. Please revert back to previous state.

These are undiscussed and unapproved mass changes. Please revert back to previous state.

These are undiscussed and unapproved mass changes. Please revert back to previous state.

Hi, cities are not defined by population. These cities are defined by CT and are subsidiary to towns. That is why there are two admin levels: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_towns_in_Connecticut

Also some CDP are still active villages or boroughs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Mystic,_Connecticut
I don't understand why you go ahead and edit something without discussing it first. Btw are you at least from CT?

In iD, you can add new tags either thorough "Add field" or scroll down and expand "Tags" section.

I see. In more complicated situations, more nuancing and personal judgement might be required.
If it was the former official name. Then osm.wiki/Tag:old_name=... can be used.
Do people still refer to it in that way? Ten perhaps osm.wiki/Tag:alt_name=...
If it was not the name but more like name of operator, then perhaps osm.wiki/Tag:disused:operator=... But OSM does not really store historical data, so this is more controversial and the use is more for closed down buildings that no one has turned into new business yet.

All good. Keep on going!

Is the "Riversdale Farms building 1" an official name of that building or just its description? If the latter then the name tag should not be used. One could mark it as operator = "Riversdale Farms". (if there are more buildings then ref = 1 can be added).
Otherwise good job!

This is just a problem with AllTrails not using OSM data properly for rendering. Maybe a bit of poking would get them going on this.

There is a better imagery for this purpose. In iD go to background settings (or press B) and select "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta". Just keep in mind that these images are few years outdated.

Just to bring to attention, there is a scheme from mapping marked hiking tails as relations: osm.wiki/United_States/Long_distance_trails

Hi David, is that "bushwhack" an exiting trail? Because if it isn't blazed or otherwise marked and no path is visible, we don't want to mislead people into are where they would get lost.

The correct tagging is:
atv=no
trail_visibility=intermediate