Mashin's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
104713154	almost 5 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713230	almost 5 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713294	almost 5 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713389	almost 5 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713425	almost 5 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713462	almost 5 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713552	almost 5 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713667	almost 5 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
104713739	almost 5 years ago	Seriously, immediately stop deleting building part otherwise this will have to be solved trough DWG!
95774447	almost 5 years ago	Thanks!
95774447	almost 5 years ago	It's part of conflation with the pre-existing data. I don't remember particularly about the station, but isn't that building the station itself?
104699786	almost 5 years ago	Thanks for helping to improve CT! Just please don't delete building parts.
102754566	almost 5 years ago	If you think that it is better on the building outline then you can go ahead and do the change. also.. conflation plugin for JOSM should handle that pretty easy.
102754566	almost 5 years ago	When there are multiple addresses for one building they have to be on nodes and this way it looks more consistent (and easier to spot problems). But if people want to later put them on the building polygon or entrance node they can do that.
100710888	almost 5 years ago	Hi MapleExplorer, thanks for your edits, but did you get a permission from the author of the map to use it for adding features to OSM? Also, what happened to the paths? many have unrealistically sharp angles or are not connected to anything else.
102150599	almost 5 years ago	Hi bevalim, Thanks for adding all that useful information. Would you mind including source of the data in your changesets. When it comes to copyright we like to avoid potential future problems. Thanks
101515557	almost 5 years ago	Hey Kevin, historic=ruins is more for significant historic structures like castles. In this case abandoned:man_made=watermill is more appropriate. Also "Mill Ruins" is too generic, do they have names?
101286280	almost 5 years ago	Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM. However, I have to ask you: 1. Please do not delete existing objects. If they need updating, then edit their shape or tags. 2. Please don't create overlapping areas. See leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for how to map correctly. 3. Do not tag for <what ever software you are using>. If the area is marsh then leave it as march and don't change it to grass.
6076393	almost 5 years ago	Hi, I am working on fixing rivers in Georgia. What the purpose of these small stream fragments? e.g. way/82011473 I assume they were meant to indicate occasional flow. I am merging them and labeling as intermittent=yes. Is that correct?
101006386	about 5 years ago	I don't think that it makes sense to have isolated 0.5 mile road stretches across CT labeled as trunk roads. Would you want to be routed somewhere just because your navigation wanted to save 3 seconds on "higher" class road? Also this doesn't really fit trunk description as high performance or high importance road similar to interstate highway. Typically, "a relatively high-speed divided road (at least 40 MPH with a barrier or median separating each direction of traffic".