Hi,
this might need abandoned:landuse=landfill or landuse=landfill + disused=yes since it is not actively used anymore.

Hi Quincy,
It's a mix of both. There are name tags that are truly descriptive and not an actual name e.g. red trail. The other names are just a duplicate of what is already in the hiking relation and creates just a duplicate when name searching. This is actually quite common way of mapping hiking routes and makes the data more tidy.
There are dedicated hiking maps that show these names from relations. Though, some maps have made a decision of not showing them and in my opinion adding the names as a workaround goes against the creators intent.
Cheers

Hi and welcome to OSM!
The current agreement is to place school names only the whole school-ground area, but not on the building itself as that would create duplicates when searching objects by name.

Cheers

Hi,
For the future, if you see a path that has a 'no trespassing' sign or is behind a gate please add `access=private` tag instead of deleting it.
Thanks

Hi, there is no need to remove driveways.
If a driveway has a gate or a 'no trespassing' sign we put access=private tag on the road.
If the road has a sign saying private, but is without a gate or trespassing restriction we label it as ownership=private.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Thanks for for fixing the road location, that was indeed placed in a wrong spot.

I just noticed that you forgot to delete a driveway that was in the same location so I went ahead and fixed that.

Cheers

Hi,
Judging by the look on aerial imagery it seems to me that those residential roads extend to their original location. (you can switch background by pressing B and selecting CT ECO 2019)

Driveways are those narrow roads that lead from the residential road to the house. Those we tag as highway=service and service=driveway.

Cheers

Hi and thanks for helping OSM!
A note for this edit: POI node and building should only be merged if the whole building belong the the business. In this case that is not true.
Cheers

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569298

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569298

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569298

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569298

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569196

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569196

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569196

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569196

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569196

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569196

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569196

This edit was discussed on OSM US Slack https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC64SHQ64/p1705684611647409

changeset/146569196