This is one of my pictures and I'm certain the post office is now at the correct location:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Royal_Oak_Inn_and_post_office_in_Winsford_Somerset.jpg

I didn't cover the location of the old one but I think it's safe to assume that there aren't two post offices so close to each other, so I've deleted the old one. Thanks for noticing!

Woah, that's pretty bad. I've fixed this road with JOSM now but that's a bug in Vespucci.

Je kan de putten van de strandwerken goed zien op de luchtbeelden van Informatie Vlaanderen van 2016: https://framapic.org/WbGKp7eP3bXE/0FlbGqQRxzrM.png

Die beelden kan je toevoegen in JOSM. Ze zijn deel van "WMS Orthofotomozaïek, middenschalig, winteropnamen" op https://overheid.vlaanderen.be/producten-diensten/Luchtopnamen

Hi AdVerburg, makes sense. I had interpreted the coordinates from the NtM (BaZ) as ° ' " but they're ° ' with decimals. Corrected in changeset/63824768

I added tags in changeset/63825066

> The seamark:name is not really a name, but a description. → I fully agree.

Thanks!

Looking at some pictures on the web, I find versions of The Royal Oak pub with and without post office in front, so I think it was moved here and my new version is indeed correct. But I'll check this weekend.

Hi, thanks for the notice. This weekend I'll see if I can find my photographs of this place.

Hm, ik vind highway=pedestrian precies niet zo geschikt voor de paden in het Koning Albert I-park. Maar het is misschien alleen omdat het er lelijk uitziet op de rendering, ik weet het niet goed …

Due to your persistent vandalism, all your changesets have been reverted and you are blocked from further editing.

Hi, you break destinations. The destination:lanes=destforlane1|destforlane2|… tag requires one value per lane. The turn:lanes tag you add is incorrect in the same way. Please read the wiki before editing <tag>:lanes: osm.wiki/Lanes

source+=Mapillary

Geen wikipedia voor object dat slechts gerelateerd is aan wiki artikel enkel als als het exacte onderwerp is in dit geval dus enkel nl:Belwind aan de windmolens op zee geven

Link to changeset mentioned in `source`: changeset/59776372

The source for that changeset is https://www.viapass.be/fileadmin/viapass/documents/download_en/2018_Kaarten_met_titels_UK_Vlaanderen.pdf

village_green is specifieks: "a distinctive part of a village centre". It's an area of common land (usually grass but may also be a lake), in the centre of a village.

Dat is waarschijnlijk niet waarvoor je het gebruikt. Vroeger wist ik dat ook niet en heb ik dat ook veel gedaan, maar het is dus niet juist. Er is landuse=grass voor gewoon gras, barrier=hedge voor lineaire hagen, landcover=bushes voor struikgewas (niet breed ondersteund, natural=scrub wordt hier ook vaak voor ge-/misbruikt), en voor bomen landcover=trees (idem, en natural=wood en landuse=forest zijn de misbruikte tags) en natural=tree_row.

Teruggedraaid in changeset/62677634

Yes, that's very true :p

Seems to have been introduced in changeset/15177330

Full disclosure: I salvaged my fixes that were not "removing line=substation" in changeset/62613792 . The line=substation is still there.

This is a technically a reversion of changeset/62612995, but I re-added the (in my view still pointless) tag "line=substation", so the net result now is only non controversial fixes to power infrastructure around the world.

But thanks anyway for having the courtesy of notifying me, and not covertly adding shaming FIXME's in the database, like mrlanduse did. Much appreciated.

And what does this tag mean? How can you claim to add meaningful information when you don't define what it should mean? I can understand if you're testing stuff and you're documenting when you played around a bit, I can also understand if tags are so obvious you don't bother with documenting them, but stuff like this?

Hi, is it your deliberate choice to use voltage=230k instead of voltage=230000? This is non-standard. If you don't aim to change tagging practices, you should consider using 230000 instead. Best, M!dgard