Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100507555

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100507762

Hi, thanks for your mapping. The tags that are chosen for the street are not correct and the crossing added I not possible to very from remote
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100507190

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings. Also it is better to adjust the size instead of delete them and draw it again
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100507399

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100507533

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100507736

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100508040

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100508328

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505943

Also, it is not needed to add something in the name field. It is information that we couldn't know from remote and for sure "Edificio" is not the name of the building
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505930

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505930

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505925

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505876

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505876

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505839

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505829

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505810

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505810

Ciao, ho visto che hai cambiato il tag associato alla strada, residential è utilizzato nelle zone prettamente circondate da case, track poteva andare meglio forse unclassified è la migliore. Il fatto che la maggior parte delle strade nella zona è residential credo sia frutto di un errore precedente
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505784

Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100505755