Hey, I don't think it was right to connect the ends of residential roads to the pavements I mapped, I don't think it's necessary to have connections here given that the pavements are now mapped separately in detail. If a connection is necessary for routing, I would use footway=link with a barrier=kerb node, rather than continuing the highway=residential way onto the pavement. Thanks.

Also retagged highway=give_way entering roundabouts to traffic_sign=give_way

It's Coole

Correction: the real overpass query is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2iSW - includes parent ways for loading into josm

Fyi @GPMapper I fixed wikimedia_commons= on the Kazahkstan relation (it was incorrectly tagged wikimedia_commons=CategoryKazakhstan-Russia border), clearly just an autofill error in this case. changeset/177271178

Correction to my initial message: I meant to link this way as an example where sheep can be seen grazing and therefore should be tagged landuse=meadow: way/1466753375
In my opinion the difference between meadow and landuse is not contentious (within the wider community). It's clearly explained on the wiki that landuse=farmland is to be used for areas that are tilled and crops planted. This differs from the wiki definition for landuse=meadow: land vegetated by grass used for growing hay or grazing animals. I don't follow what you are referring to in regards to heirarchy of nomenclature and first principles, but it seems like there's some kind of official designation of farmland that you're adhering to. Just because an area is zoned as farmland, does not mean it must be tagged as landuse=farmland, if its usage corresponds better to another tag. I don't believe it's ambiguous to classify things as meadow, in fact it's more ambiguous to classify everything as farmland. I'm sure the majority of the OSM community would agree with that, it's clearly documented. Unfortunately, individual mappers aren't allowed to apply their own personal definitions to tags, we all have to work together.

Can you please use landuse=meadow instead of landuse=farmland for meadows or pasture? landuse=meadow
For example landuse=meadow you can even see the sheep grazing on aerial imagery...

For your information, these changesets have been raised on the community forums: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/undiscussed-mass-edits-of-sport-rugby-union-and-sport-rugby-league/140303

Where has this mass edit been discussed? sport=rugby_union has over 7,600 uses, are you planning on retagging every single one? Where is the rationale behind this?

Hey, what's the source for the housenumbers you've added here? :)

Will be useful having these tags organised for the inevitable cleanup of nonexistent railway features (such as way/40596345) 👍

I don't think it would be wrong to add that name, as there is no other existing name for this street. For example, the Eastenders set has all the street names and pois mapped (not using standard tags). Presumably the landuse=residential needs to be changed to some kind of commercial/film studio area, as I didn't realise it was a purpose built area when I originally mapped here.

👀

This is not the correct way to use landuse=farmland... maybe something along the lines of boundary=place + place=farm would work better? (as a relation)

I've reverted this changeset alongside thirteen others - they all added Dutch names to footpaths and roads in the UK and Germany.

I've changed these back from farmland to meadow, as I surveyed here just a month before your changes and these were all very clearly meadows, and are visible as meadows on aerial imagery too. Unless you have information about a change of landuse here?

Hi, it would be preferable if buildings were not imported from mapwithai / microsoft buildingfootprints when they still need to be split further - for example semidetached and terraced houses as is the case here. Thanks.

I've restored the tertiary road that appears to have been incorrectly deleted

Hi, thanks for helping to improve building coverage in OSM! As you're making use of rapid's suggested buildings, I wanted to let you know that they are not suitable for import in all situations, for example where there are semidetached or terraced houses. It would be preferable to draw these types of houses manually, so that each property can have one building polygon instead of being merged with adjoining houses. For example, way/1460161479 is a terrace of four houses, way/1460161480 is two semidetached houses and way/1460096302 looks like two detached houses. Overall, everything else looks good as this is an area of mainly detached houses. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask and happy mapping! :)

I've partially reverted this changeset in changeset/176120320 - why did you delete 100 parking spaces from the car park?