Hi, thanks for helping to improve building coverage in OSM! As you're making use of rapid's suggested buildings, I wanted to let you know that they are not suitable for import in all situations, for example where there are semidetached or terraced houses. It would be preferable to draw these types of houses manually, so that each property can have one building polygon instead of being merged with adjoining houses. For example, way/1460161479 is a terrace of four houses, way/1460161480 is two semidetached houses and way/1460096302 looks like two detached houses. Overall, everything else looks good as this is an area of mainly detached houses. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask and happy mapping! :)

I've partially reverted this changeset in changeset/176120320 - why did you delete 100 parking spaces from the car park?

Hi, if you have footways overlapping buildings, it would be best to correct the buildings by moving them instead of adding layer=1 / -1. Happy mapping :)

what kind of 'edits'? It would be helpful if you could briefly summarise what you added or edited (or in this case deleted) to make it easier for other editors to understand your changes. Thanks.

Why not keep the way present, tagged disused:highway=cycleway or similar to prevent the cycleway from being re-added by mistake?

In what way would 'Strand Building' not appear in its address? It has no other housename or housenumber tagged, so how would that work? Is it because they are university buildings that something different should happen with these?

This changeset was reverted by changeset/175728513 - please do not delete military base features, they are added from normal aerial imagery and do not contain secret or sensitive information.

This changeset was reverted by changeset/173623367 - please do not delete military base features, they are added from normal aerial imagery and do not contain secret or sensitive information.

I made it up. I did see that a couple days ago and think 'what a crazy tag, who put that there' and then I realised... I think the rationale was that the campsite is only open for visitors on a select few days of the year (for example the Grand Prix weekend.) So, it didn't make sense to me to have it as a tourism=campsite. But perhaps it should be so, just with freeform opening_hours set.

"If anyone finds this, idk" - if you select the deleted node on this changeset you can view its history

Hi, I've tweaked your changes so that instead of the footway being deleted, it's now marked as disused:highway=footway. This is because it's a public right of way, so it would be likely that someone would re-add the missing section, not knowing it is nonexistent as you have surveyed. Would you be able to share why the path wasn't here, for example if the bridge has been removed? This information could also be added as a note on the affected footways.

I reverted some of these changes in changeset/175424620 - please do not change tags to remove the : - they were correct as they were

Reverted - you duplicated a building that was already here

Reverted in changeset/175424425 - perhaps in the future if you think something was tagged incorrectly you could contact the user that mapped it instead of making destructive incorrect changes? For the record - using a colon (:) in tags is common practice.

Reverted in changeset/175424358 - I suggest you learn what "standard tags" are before you start making damaging mass edits to OSM

Hi, it would have been better to do a complete revert of changeset changeset/174970701 as it was basically all vandalism

I've also removed node/13345949537 as it duplicated relation/2823719

I've removed natural=island from relation/3137401 as it was added incorrectly

The following nodes were removed:
node/13345312563 duplicated relation/2823200

node/13345312564 duplicated relation/2955118

node/13345312565 was vandalism

Hi, thanks for making this change. Fyi your edit removed building=apartments which I have just restored.