I see someone else has already done it.

That is only true for the focus-point of the image.
But that is not the point:
Moving the building means that everyting wich is attached to the building moved too and than to a wrong position. The southern circular part of the building is not shown anymore on the map because of the self-crossing outline.
So severe damage to the map.
I will revert this changeset.

You can see your changeset:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112775085
You took a lot of ways together with the building to a wrong position.
I consider to revert this changeset.
Please give a reaction.

Na lange tijd weer aktief geworden, zie ik, maar nooit ons welkomst bericht gehad.
Ik stuur het alsnog.

Dag P vd Veer,

Je hebt nu het gehele gebouw verwijderd van de kaart.
Was dat ook de bedoeling ?

You draw a highway over the sea and around the half of the world.

Please, never, never moves the map over this long distanves.

I removed the way.

Very good, thanks.

way/992449139

Never, never move the map over this kind of distance !!!

You draw a way from Seattle to Friesoythe.
What does that mean ?
I consider removing the way from the map.

That is on purpose.
In the Netherlands, buildings and adresses are imported from the government office "Kadaster".
So the position and outline of the buildings are very good.
The adresses come in this import as a separate node. This adress-node we also use for the POI.
First the adres is not double in the database. And it solves the problem for many stores in one building.
Removing the adressnode will be followed with a new import of this adress-node. If a starting mapper tags the store on the building, then we move the tags to the adress-node and tell him to follow this methode.
If there are other questions I will be happy to provide an answer.
kind regards,
Leo

be careful, even with JOSM it is very difficult because there are so many ways that are twice in the routerelation.

reverted with my changeset/112497803

It will take at least more then an hour to make those routerelations correct.
So I consider to revert this changeset.
What is your reaction ?

Due to bad mapping 28 routerelations were damaged.
If you are mapping two ways (to and off) a roundabout, always make it two separate ways. otherwise de ways in the routerelation are not in the correct order.
Here you can see what routes are damaged:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=5.25040&lat=51.79397&zoom=12&opacity=0.74&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes.
Please do not try to handle routerelations with the editor iD.
The editor iD can not make correct changes to routerelations.

En ook de beschadigde routerelaties van bus 300 en 830 zijn weer gerepareerd.

En de beschadigde routerelaties van bus 556 zijn ook weer gerepareerd.

Is deze Fixme inmiddels afgehandeld ?

De bushalte staat niet op de juiste plaats en was reeds op de kaart aanwezig.
Zoek in de wiki even op hoe je een bushalte correct van tags voorziet.

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=4.78580&lat=52.51041&zoom=16&opacity=0.77