note/2331359

note/2694727

note/2689281

note/2662669

note/2662669

Pot, kettle, black.

Please state your definition of “attack”, particularly how it's distinct from “(constructive) criticism”.

That's not a case of misspelling (which applies to words).

I was attempting to be backward-compatible while using a more structured, less redundant tagging methodology.

“Bing Imagery was on at the time of the editing”

Then add the imagery_used changeset key.

👍🙂

Much smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Much smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

From changeset/110409629

“Tool co-author here.

Today there's no workable solution available to analyze large changesets.

…”

How was it misspelled?

Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

▪︎Much smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
▪︎what makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments — fixed them how?
▪︎how did you derive cuisine type from Bing? If imagery, I don't see how (and in that case it shouldn't be source but imagery_used), if copying from Bing maps; surely that's a copyright violation?

▪︎What makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
▪︎smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

“[[Chuck Sites]]”

This isn't Wikipedia(, thankfully).

Great, another [un]Friendly_Ghost 🙄🤦‍♂️.