OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
115764532

note/2343010

11863662

“phone box is visible on StreetView in a recess in the playground wall”

So it is: http://www.google.com/maps/@49.1894226,-2.1050229,0a,75y,326.87h,89.48t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s2_YpXzpN4-NqopEny5WKLw!2e0 . I didn't even think to check what Google had.

I had a through look around; pretty sure it's now not where the photo shows it to have been.
Will resurvey, to be sure. The node position is incorrect, still.

“If it's no longer there, you've done the right thing to remove it.”

JT have (in the past couple years) not only decommissioned, but entirely removed a whole bunch of them, box and all (you'd think we'd follow the UK's example and reuse them to host defibrillators). I've been trying to survey the original sites to mark-as-removed the sacrificial ones, so that normies aren't misled when querying their app for the nearest phone.

While they're not easy to spot, this one was particularly mysterious & difficult.

Some do still exist, seemingly maintained, though.

JT's excuse seems to be the cost of upkeep, when usage is declining (because most everyone has their own portable phone, now). Yet, they set the price for local calls to be zero, and continue to price-hike on their other services (especially fibre). So, 🤷‍♂️.

Similar with the many post boxes which are no longer collected from. At least those still exist.

I'll get to them all, eventually.

115728494

Seems good.

Though, for avoidance of ambiguity: this refers to lanes=N (count) rather than lane:ref=* (numeric IDs).

76915572

See changeset/115750910

115647864

Seconding puma515.

115680323

Automated edit?

115629029

What makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments 🥳

115635224

Your changeset doesn't specify a source=* so how is this not an automated edit (sans approval)?

115709601

“uploaded all changes at the same time”

That's to be avoided: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

The efforts (& enthusiasm) of your changes are appreciated. There's just good & bad ways of contributing. See osm.wiki/Good_practice 🙂.

115722379

Much smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

91648360

Don't delete only to them re-add. osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

91648720

What's this got to do with HOT or Tanzania?

Since it's then very unclear what's been changed & why; what makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

91648471

What's this got to do with HOT or Tanzania?

Since it's then very unclear what's been changed & why; what makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

91648428

What's this got to do with HOT or Tanzania?

Since it's then very unclear what's been changed & why; what makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

91648360

What's this got to do with HOT or Tanzania?

Since it's then very unclear what's been changed & why; what makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

91233873

What's this got to do with HOT or Kenya?

Since it's then very unclear what's been changed & why; what makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

115752067

See changeset/115753486 for re-tagging.

115753486

See also node/3350834580 (to be updated, once available in tomorrow's exports).

91233564

What's this got to do with HOT or Kenya?

Since it's then very unclear what's been changed & why; what makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

You also deleted a node (node/3350834580 ) for a feature which still exists.

115752067

Having passed by, recently, it's still there.