“socket:type2_cable”

Good to know, I'll keep that in mind for when I add other charging_stations.

Much smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Note #1425550.

Much smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Like SekeRob said; smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

StreetComplete is only for making changes input while actually there, on-site.
Since I seriously doubt that you're a playboy with a private jet, then source=survey is very misleading. At best its local knowledge. So, use an editor which allows you to set the value of the source tag (viz Vespucci) and then separate different areas into separate (small) changesets. Else, don't ignore the were-you-really-there? warnings that StreetComplete gives when your location doesn't (closely) match the location of the element you're changing. Use it only as intended: for actual surveying of your local area (or wherever you are at the time).

If you do indeed travel, then upload your quest-answers from one area BEFORE answering quests in a different area (most airports have 802.11 (Wi-Fi) now).

Other mappers thank you in advance for your consideration & cooperation in what is ultimately a community project.

The changeset comment doesn't match the extent of the bounding box.

See:
* osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
* (what makes for) osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Seems that the developers already know: https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-classic/issues/29

“take the effort to approach them via their one and only 'official' channel”

Shouting into the wind.

This account is tolerated, at best, because of the nature of changes made.

I suppose the alternative is many frequent changesets (like a certain bot concerned with doing s/http:/https:/ ).

Perhaps a programmer could see if they have a source-code repository, somewhere, for a patch to be applied.

Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

What makes for osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments 🙂.

Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Smaller changeset areas, please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Same problems with tagging values as with changeset #112214229.

Setting surface=gravel is misleading, too. Should be fine_gravel. gravel is large chippings / small stones / pebble-sized. fine_gravel is closer to grit, which (last time I saw it) is what the Walk's surface actually is.

Besides lack of source=*, the tagging changes made here are to less specific values.

The railway walk is, indeed, designated for foot (the clue being in the name) & bicycle. Setting a value of yes simply means that those types of traffic are permitted at all.

Setting motor_vehicle=no is also dubious, since there are places for maintenance vehicles to access the Railway Walk, and I've seen such vehicles on the Walk in the past.

Having inspected more closely, no joining of ways seem to be in this changeset, only tagging changes.

Thus, the changeset comment is misleading.

Correction: Don Street, not Don Road.

Again, source= ?