Layft Greater's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 71101580 | I believe this relation should have been mapped as no-u-turn.
|
|
| 142066304 | This resolves note note/2839544 |
|
| 162049167 | resolves note #4596009 |
|
| 160345302 | awesome job |
|
| 161514646 | The street is now has a strange shape please check |
|
| 161149637 | Discussable, but I think this is not a graffiti but a mural |
|
| 134591839 |
This way looks like a track. Could you please re-check if it is correcly mapped as waterway? |
|
| 155116521 | I suppose construction was a temporary event because the road is now open. It is a good practice not to map temporary events osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features |
|
| 133755907 |
not a shop=mall, just landuse |
|
| 150495143 |
duplicate of way/30802750 |
|
| 152775154 | Please add junction key for roundabouts. Is it a roundabout or just a circular junction? |
|
| 158779110 | removed own added signs |
|
| 148126750 | I will update the road to "proposed" if you don't mind. Even if the road is not visible on the map - the data is there. |
|
| 148126750 | Hello Dimster! I have changed the road type from "construction" to "proposed" and realized that we had already updated the road in the past :) I would like to clarify the road's status (this part and others respectively). Is the construction of the beltway started or it is only planned? |
|
| 154977476 | Hello them97! Could you please check this node node/2217225589/ After this edit the powerline looks a bit like a saw way/963696170 The node appears to be off it's original location. I could not determine was it a mistake or intentional because the powerline tower is not visible on aerial imagery. Thank you in advance! |
|
| 148218393 | Nikos? |
|
| 156818308 | One person has surveyed and mapped the junction construction. Another one has serveyed and mapped the construction completed.
I guess I have to escalate this situation |
|
| 156892742 | See discussion on changeset changeset/156818308 |
|
| 156818308 | Spaghetti Monster, I would like to point two topics here: 1. The location of the intersection was mapped not here but in changeset #156722732.
2. By your comment I was expecting the location of the intersection will be adjusted but not completely removed. The junction was OK as it was. Will you will you be able to revert your edit #156892742? |
|
| 128744802 | Brand was correct. I have mapped under a different Wikidata QID |