Ok thx, I will accept this solution. What I thought is there is already way/897549860 that it may not be helpful to show they belong to it.

There is also an `alt_name=` here. Handling different summits is tricky.

Please explain this. It's not "spam" if it exists.

Do not simply "beautify" things. You have to consider the reality of separation, and functionality of merging and diverging.

Please check `placement=` and `*:lanes=` tagging. There is nothing to fix here.

Also check way/897549860

There is an `alt_name=` so I'm not sure what you want to do.

No brackets in `name=` please. This is a proper name, not printed map descriptor label. Notice the `*_name=`.

It's not "unneccessary" if the low point exists.

I have difficulty believing the shorter one is named. There is also the possibility of different ones sharing the same name.

2. Connecting to a fence doesn't make sense either.

Please draw a new line. It obviously can't go over a hilltop and connect another one.

2. The force the department is operating may also be HKFS.

2. Which should be `=Fire Services Department` without "Hong Kong".

Please don't remove `name=` on `building=`. What you can actually do is remove the `=fire_station`.
2. FSD is more common than HKFSD, although you can argue `ref=` and `short_name=`.

It's not a `=motorway` though.

No idea why you would move the `power=line` here either.

Please don't delete other features that still exist. If the name is wrong, remove it.

Please don't de-duplicate `name=` in `building=` and `landuse=`. They serve different purpose, at least the local practice here.

Please don't attach irrelevant features to roads. This doesn't reflect reality, and makes editing difficult.