2. Don't attach lines to other objects.

Please don't make up English names.

Please only use `natural=peak` when it is higher than the entire surrounding. `place=locality` otherwise.

1. Please don't draw such a large `landuse=`. There are already individual ones inside. This is meaningless.
2. Please don't attach areas to roads. This makes editing difficult, and doesn't reflect reality.
Don't upload your own data to online for personal purposes. Stay offline, or use other software.

In fact there's already `motor_vehicle=no`, and `vehicle=no` (which may be wrong), here. Don't Tag For Renderer. Drivers shouldn't expect all roads to be open. Other restrictions aren't rendered directly either.

Please don't use `access=no` alone. This breaks pedestrian and bikes. Use `motor_vehicle=` instead.

2. This is obviously not where it is.

Please don't add not yet existing features directly.

* Ignore 2

1. Sorry what's the problem with `wikidata=` here?
2. Naming sidings with line name is not needed.

Duplicate way/860350498 please don't compose a names if there is none.

Please don't delete restricted ones. If it itself still exists, use `access=no` or others.

Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`. This is not a paper map.

Please don't quote other maps. This is unnecessary, and violates copyright.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

3. A facility can be named based on the larger area it serves, and be located away from its proper or center.

1. Why can't the entire district be CWB?
2. This is poor geography interpretation. The west side is full of business and owned by private lands. Government facilities are located near residential areas, and where empty lands exist.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

See node/1000961987

Please only add the reality as in common use by the public. Put historic concepts in OHM.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (osm.wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.

This correctly records the regulations and obstacles, and prevents others from adding it.