OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
91870335

`service=driveway` isn't used on carparks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91870335

91870050

The intention was that this continues the `highway=trunk_link`.. The `highway=primary` can't exit through it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91870050

91851849

This also ignores pedestrians
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91851849

91851849

Please don't use `access=permit` for "except for permit"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91851849

91852173

More critically, looks like the footbridge isn't anywhere completed
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91852173

91852094

Also duplicated `amenity=toilets` (although their representation in general could be discussed)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91852094

91852094

Use `loc_ref=` for those local stop ones.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91852094

91851849

There's no need to delete the area
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91851849

89823406

Why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89823406

88576643

Please check that lanes and other configuration are changed when merging
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88576643

89015791

Please don't move non-physically divided road segments downstream, or remove lane details
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89015791

90554897

You reactivated the closed way/41888144/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90554897

72774177

Similar issue with rubber-tyred trains, which the electrodynamic suspension SCMaglev uses at lower than levitation speeds.

72774177

If anyone reads this late reply: the problem is this isn't a monorail-type maglev a la Transrapid.

91453880

`species=Arecaceae` and `genus=Arecaceae` are precisely wrong. Do you want yet another incorrect usage of those keys?
If you prefer using individual levels rather than `taxon=`, that's why I chose `family=` over `taxon:family=`. Do you plan on doing something on the other 209 `family=` instances?

91453880

Family is obviously not species. There are 48 `family=Arecaceae` among 210 valid`family=` instances, as well as 126 `taxon:family=` which is fewer. I'm not sure if you will be happy with the latter. There are also ~100 `order=`, if not counting the ~500 `order=Coniferales`. Are you going to change them all? I don't see `taxon:*=` being recommended, despite amount of `taxon:species=` and `taxon:cultivar=` (let alone 580 `cultivar=`).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91453880

83365263

Please check those houses has been demolished
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83365263

91173443

Please distinguish between `leisure=sports_centre` and `leisure=sports_hall`, aside from the need to transfer tags completely

91165274

Please don't disconnect `highway=pedestrian` from roads
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91165274

90031649

Please don't delete sections with `turn:lanes=` either.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90031649