OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
88378878

It's not neccessary to add `bicycle=designated` to `highway=cycleway`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88378878

88364747

If it's not specifically constructed as a `=cycleway`, it should be better as a `=path`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88364747

88364393

This would be `highway=path` + `foot=designated` + `bicycle=designated`+ `segregated=no`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88364393

56776870

changeset/88251164

88230453

Don't blindly follow iD's description. `highway=track` is usually a field road inside a forest or farm area (sometimes it's used in construction sites). `highway=service` is a road in a permise/site/facility. They don't refer to a "single-track" access road.`highway=residential` is considered a public road (although some "private road" owned and operated privately are public).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88230453

88206940

"Permit" is interpreted case-by-case. In general, it means a publicly applicable permit, with unspecified difficulty. This should be at least `vehicle=private`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88206940

88207311

Use `covered=yes` instead of lower `layer=` for these
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88207311

88091732

How do you even know if customers aren't allowed to park there?

88091732

Or `covered=yes`?

88091732

Dude what's your problem? Do you understand `highway=service` and `motor_vehicle=private`?

88091732

Does the hotel "not exist at all"?

88091732

What happened here? Don't simply delete an object without substituting it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88091732

87899400

As well as `incline=*`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87899400

87899400

Please notice short segments of `placement=transition`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87899400

87844239

This is dubious by the `access=no` usage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87844239

87825932

Please use `amenity=parking_space` with `capacity=` for these
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87825932

87764890

For example: A generic `highway=path` may physically be able to allow at most single-tracked only; A `highway=pedestrian` physically allows two-tracked ie four-wheeled or above vehicles to drive on it. But these doesn't say all such vehicles are allowed legally.

87764890

The keys you are looking at refer to legal restriction, not physical accessibility. The `highway=*` value already indicates what vehicles can it drive on.

87804202

Duplicate feature way/764617505, and please don't remove `building=roof`
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87804202

87769220

Please understand how `=permit` works as well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87769220