Is there really an English name for it? No need to add a forced romanization.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85976216

Please use `description:en=` if you want to, Don't clutter with generic names
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85974735

Please add `description:*=`, not clutter with generic names
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85923149

Please add `description:en=`, not clutter with generic names
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85924998

(or something similar to "address" / "is in")

@pantufla Well, the lines you created are something more to maintain as well.
@skquinn I deliberately didn't mention coastlines. There should be too many of them to be added, especially to a multipolygon. Something like `boundary=maritime` would work better.

>>Until we can set better boundaries, this is an approximate as good as I could do it.
You should have at least re-used national and state boundaries for a closer fit, or representing international waters. Right now it's very arbitary.

Thanks changeset/85804139

* 1. "Disney Resort" seems to be a common reference.

1. "Disney Parks, Experiences and Products" is the company division. The combined brand, according to the page you linked is something like Disney parks and resorts. The division is formerly named "Disney Parks and Resorts" too. Since there's both theme parks and resorts to take care of, I represented them separately, This is to further fit with `branch=` tagging. Do you have have suggestions about that?
2. Hotels falls under `landuse=commercial`, so that's what I based on. A leisure feature can sell services.. ("point of sales location for businesses" is `landuse=retail` specifically)
3. A theme park is not really a "place". `place=locality` is for when there's no specific tags. Unless you suggest it is a "place" for census purposes, it is not really useful.

Can you explain your changes? You haven't responded to previous discussions.

Can you explain why you removed `landuse=commercial`? Also why did you add `place=locality` in the first place?

If anyone happens to read this, he undid some changes, viz duplicating `tourism=theme_park` on the `leisure=resort` area. I'm trying to get a sense of how much he has he done.

Exactly, how do you think I edited in all the basic details for them?

Please check the number of lanes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85671744

Thank you, but it's better to effect the changes on that day. I recorded it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85565542

Thank you, but it's better to effect the changes on that day. I recorded it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85565722

For 1, there is a recent decision by some to affirm the tagging of non-Expressway Expressway connections as `=motorway_link` even on main line.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85497674

1. Please check the extent of Expressway on Ma On Shan Rd carefully. It is considered as `highway=motorway` as a fork from Tate's Cairn Hwy, and a Expressway segment on its own.
2. Please observe the local guideline on Tunnel area.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85497674

Please distinguish between a resort and a theme park, and don't duplicate the latter within each other.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85517184