OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
81893662

Please ensure that you at least transfer tags completely if you really need to delete then recreate objects.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81893662

81891298

Please don't remove connections to area entrances.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81891298

81890286

Please don't delete crosswalks then extend sidewalks as it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81890286

71032956

#resolved

71032956

changeset/81887865, changeset/81887887, changeset/81888017
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/71032956

71032956

Same in changeset/71032389

71032389

Please don't remove `building=` from `landuse=` without replacement. On the hand, proceed with caution when referencing copyrighted maps.

71032956

Please don't remove `building=` when creating `landuse=`.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/71032956

81825246

Same outstanding issue that can be discussed as /changeset/81824625
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81825246

81824625

Eg for the very long Airport Rd leading to North Lantau Highway only

81824625

Ok look, I'm not saying you are wrong, but we can satisfy both aspects at the same time. However, this can be further debated for main line leading to Expressway only (ie not links).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81824625

81343542

Also bus relations are broken
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81343542

81343542

About way/775538255, it is a single roadway separated by delineators/bollards, so this is usually considered as 2 ways. It is a good question whether continuous separation (ie at least wire-rope) is needed, but such is the common practice.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81343542

81705827

Also tag unsigned and difficulty?

81705827

Perhaps it could be `access=discouraged`?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81705827

81668600

Please don't put irrelevant info in `name=`. Put this in `description=`. See changeset/81686556.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81668600

81671667

/way/494702550 `substation=` corrected in / changeset/81686442
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81671667

81628041

* (2. I also don't know if people map the walls of a fountain that can be sit on, or assume most fountains have an edge that allows sitting)

81628041

1. They look like blocks that can be sit on. Although they are only adjacent to the mist nozzles, I'm not sure if they are actually used as a bench. So I left those tags there.
2. It is more of a POC. I found that someone asked a few months ago how to map fountain amenity and nozzles separately.(osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dfountain#Location_of_water_exit_points.3F) This fountain is a spray nozzle surrounded by a ring of mist nozzles. I would have used `*:separate=*` instead of `*=separate`, but I imagine this would work for compatibility reason.

81619852

我睇到個名有出喺條界到