The suggestion is to distinguish by `maxspeed:type=` `=sign` vs `=HK` (`=HK:urban` etc are wrong), not removing `maxspeed=`

Why are you moving the `building=` , but then delete the `=service` road?

Why are you deleting a unique `addr:housenumber=` ?

2. Buildings overhanging roads are common

Again deleting without even trying to change them to `building:part=`

changeset/179642577

Why are you deleting `building:part=` ?

There's nothing wrong here. Only not fully shared 1 vertex with `=park`

Please connect buildings attached together, not move them minusculely away. I have noted `apartments=terraced`

What are you trying to do here? Much deleting, and changed Hong Tin House shape by attaching vertex.

They are attached together in reality, and actually further overlaps vertically. There's nothing wrong with this in terms of standard OSM data layout either.

You don't even choose to change to `building:part=` for the `name=` (`building=` is used as they are recognized as different buildings, and each tower can have its `building:part=` which can't be grouped together in between )

Please don't delete valid data. This is the common form of architecture in HK.

+ `location=underground`

Please use `building=` , not `landuse=`

Please don't combine names in `name=` , which are for proper names only. Shared campuses should be `landuse=education` , and can have no `name=` fine. They should be 2 `=school` points inside.

You can compare eg `maxspeed:type=` still adding `maxspeed=`

It's the `sidewalk=no` , and needs to be distinguished from `foot=no` , but should add `foot:signed=none`

Why are you delete them???

`=house` is a single home. Multiple homes should be `=terrace`