It could be acceptable if it exists regularly for some years. `=marketplace` + `informal=yes` may be used.

This wasn't created here, but did get moved upstream. Reminder that dashed line means it's crossable. Therefore I would use the same criteria as unhatched islands, 45~40~30deg to the nose.

1. OSM `place=` + `name=` is about common public use. Please don't upload personal-use data.
2. Please don't directly copy from wiki, AI, and Government only. They are incompatible copyright and ToS.

Please be careful not to make the entire `building=` as `=restaurant`

That's the bad advice we are talking about. `=bus_station` should at least have a dedicated u-turn road.

I had moved that to the sea first. But it can be considered for deletion too.

It's confusing as ground level is different on each side (3F vs 4F)

Oh I missed 4F?

Wait the 6F is departures already. Which floor are you referring to?

I must have copied from other features. Missed 1 level.

OSM `name=` is about names in existing common public use. Please use OpenHistoricalMap.

They are on 2 levels for departure and arrival (and this should be `level:ref=` not `level=` , from app limitation)

No, I believe you should discuss any mass re-tagging. `{{PossibleSynonym}}` has not been used on wiki yet either.
Yes, I have documented it myself osm.wiki/Proposal:Crosswalk_clean-up#Crosswalk_as_lines
Another use for this is allowing regex or prefix search of `footway=crossing*` for all crosswalk parts. `=traffic_island` would need an union, and excluding non-crosswalk traffic island walkways.

It would at least need to be distinguished by `traffic_island=` `=crossing` vs `=platform`

Where has this been discussed? I don't favor `=traffic_island` as it may be used for the `=footway` connecting to transit platforms.

First of all, `building=terrace` must be wrong. It's used on the entire row, not individual houses, which is `=house` + `house=terraced`
Regardless, these debates really shows `=house` + `house=` being superior. Leaves arguing the attribute, instead of feature.

What does that mean?

It's `disused=yes` vs `abandoned:highway=` not `highway=` + `abandoned=yes`

Please don't delete, but change enclosed `building=` to `building:part=`

Please don't merge `building=` area with site grounds area. They are different