`=parking_aisle` should not be used if it's the only road. It doesn't mean any roads for parking. There's no aisle to speak of.

Both `addr:village=` and `addr:place=` should be added. Some villages use streets. Some are unnumbered by both, using DD lots.

It is confusing, as signs use the no-vehicle white-only sign (ground truth), but traffic orders refers to motorized vehicles, and bikes might use some such roadways in reality. The worst is when "Bus lane" is painted, which means bikes are allowed.

`oneway:bus=` is the more common one than `bus:backward=`
`oneway=` is somewhat more powerful than `*:*ward=` (`=reversible` , `=alternating` )

1. It's not "a" project, but many
2. The project, individual projects would include the improvements only, not the pre-existing and unchanged sections
3. OSM doesn't track construction project management either. That belongs to OHM.

Did you try to understand it? How is this a "route"? Footpaths being interconnected in an area doesn't make they are a "route". At least this is not one, but many. In any case, this `name=` is unacceptable, suggesting problem in this structuring.

4. Don't create `relation` based on Wikipedia articles and lists osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

3. This seems to be a `network=` , not a `=route`

1. Please don't add Something "In" Something as the `name=` , which is obviously not a proper name

`not:*=` is for OSM editing only.

@vectorial8192 That's `=designated`

Thank you for correcting `lanes=2` , but please don't remove `passing_places=yes` when adding `lanes=1`

This is not a net improvement, as `name:en=` is wrongly changed, breaking any application using it for English names to find and show bus stops. Presumably no apps are able to relate the `=bus_station` with `=bus_stop` directly and visibly.
If you know this is bad, you should use "Notes". And at least `description=` can be used, which is surely supported.

I don't know what you are doing. But you should multi-select by holding [Shift] as usual.

Please don't blindly merge different road sections. They are split to show different attributes.

2. As I said, whether this has been an estate would be covered by `abandoned:landuse=residential`

2. Eg if Wang Chi House returns, but the Court voted to rebuild, it's still `=residential` until they move out

1. The structure is independent of the use. If there's no one living there , it's not `=residential` now. Unless you are arguing it's a short-term closure.
2. `landuse=` is describing use, and OSM is about the existing reality. Legal status and plans don't affect that.

That has the entire road blocked, and physically. You said there are sidewalks available here.

Please don't remove `is_in:suburb=` here. Only unstructured `is_in=` is deprecated, not `is_in:*=` structured. There's no `boundary=administrative` to replace it.