OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
140987678

This user has been mass removing `*cn=yes` in cases where the `route=bicycle` doesn't exist.

140988135

Have you discussed this before? The situation is `surface:colour=` means the `*cn=yes` . as such it can only have one `network=` , making `network=` usable. These `route=bicycle` are not really existing, and I don't agree with `network:type=basic_network`.

140975525

Please don't add not yet opened features directly. They should use eg `construction:leisure=swimming_pool` .

140973871

Please don't delete it. This is the result of previous flawed edits. It should be fixed up.

128193554

`highway=service` + `area=yes` is correct here. The `=station` + `=bus_station` should be moved.

140703606

Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. `=construction` already indicates this.

140939554

Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. This confuses whether they are named already. `proposed:name=` hjas already been prepared.

140920347

Please don't add fictions restrictions. `=use_sidepath` and `sidewalk=` is enough.

140828800

The `=retaining_wall` itself is very short. And there's a large gap here.

140828800

This is not true. There is a large slope behind the `=retaining_wall` , which this is trying to capture.
`=cliff` has been widely used for slopes in HK.

140828800

1. I'm not the one who added it first
2. What is "the location" ? It's a few hundred metres long. As I said, move it if the position is wrong.
3. Are you sure you can drop down the slope directly from the village to Hong Lam Court?

140864189

`destination:ref=` is only used when the outgoing road is immediately that `ref=` . Otherwise the routing towards that is `destination:ref:to=` .

140842715

Please don't upload test edits. This is vandalism.

140781010

Someone else added it. The slope together with the `=retaining_wall` exists. Same with the slopes to the west in the terrain.

140826962

The bad idea here is you keep on deleting something others added without good reason.

140828800

Why don't you explain how it's non-existent?

140812911

`label` is not suitable, as `place=` is inappropriate for them.

140812911

Have you done any research? Your logic doesn't make any sense. The `admin_centre` are a placeholder only.

140781467

Please don't add such `name=` artifically . `building:levels=` and `building:part=` already represent this info.

140781010

Please move it if the position is wrong. Change feature if feature is wrong. Never delete something valid.