Please don't upload test edits. This is vandalism.

Please flush your cache, or tell your application to update and fix. This has already changed to `old_name=`. It still exists. Correct the name only if it is wrong. Don't delete it.

Please don't use `=hamlet` if they are deserted. `place=locality` + `abandoned:place=hamlet` (may also be a `=isolated_dwelling`)

Use `alt_name=`.

`name=` is for proper name only. No brackets please. This is not a printed map that needs labels.

1. It's not "excessive" if it exists. They are simply defined as high points and low points. It's up to applications and renderers to show them with priorities.
2. Please see natural=ridge#Examples eg osm.wiki/File:Druim-Eileasaig-z14-opencyclemap.png and osm.wiki/File:Walker-Ridge-z14-from-Opencyclemap.png --- They don't have to be very sharp and exposed on top, or like a `=arete`.

Please don't just delete it. This looks to be valid, if only improper representation. It's likely a `=strait` or something.

Please don't disconnect this if it still exists.

1. Please don't delete them. They still represent something in reality. They are already changed to `old_name=`. Please flush your cache, and tell your application to update or fix.
2. Descriptive changeset comments please.

Please don't mass delete.
1. They may contain address info that doesn't change. In iD, change to the plain "point" preset to keep them.
2. They still represent a shop space. Ideally use `was:shop=` or `was:amenity=`. This helps identify which shop space they are exactly, and track changes.

What's wrong with the `natural=peninsula`?

This positioning is therefore wrong in OSM. OSM is not a printed map. You put thing at where it is at exactly. Don't map for renderer.

It is partially based on paper maps. It is also a single-layer online map, not an entire map database with many renderer and applications as OSM. You should not copy from any other map directly anyway.
As I said, HP1C seems to contradict this. I haven't checked iB1000. Different maps by the same source can be different.

Can you please discuss with @Whcohi at note/3146813 concerning the name?

3. Please don't copy directly from paper maps. Their label position is affected by artistic choice and printed presentation.

Putting a `saddle` hillside is also meaningless.

The `=suburb` (even if you disagree with it as a sub-district) is not the same as the demolished `=saddle`.

2. I'm not talking about any Custom Pass, whatever it is.

1.1 You shouldn't determine something out of reality based on directly copying other official maps. The `mountin_pass=` is already kept there, as it is a high point of the road (for the concept of trail intersection and rendering, `junction=yes` already reflects it) . No `=saddle` exist there. You put something on hillside.
1.2 My point is there are two concepts called Pak Kung Au, and there can be two label positions exclusively or inclusively for it even in official maps. The `mountain_pass=` is the high point of a trail. The `=saddle` is to the east, beyond the end of the branching road.

If the names wrong, please correct them only. Don't delete the thing that still exists in reality. Some are already corrected to `old_name=`. Please refresh your map cache, or ask your application to update the data.