OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
83970580

Don't remove street details from a sidewalk
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970580

83970389

Some of them for example are different, physically separated
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970389

83970389

Please don't remove sidewalks.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970389

83970011

How are these `=suburb`?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83970011

83969658

Don't remove names from `landuse=`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83969658

83969110

Wrong English name
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83969110

83968992

This should be converted into address
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83968992

83913071

Please don't remove wrongly tagged information by deleting it only.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83913071

83909478

Can you explain if it is not a flush toilet? Don't tag for the renderer to "change icon".
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83909478

83909308

Don't tag an extra `building=*` into it if it is a part of a structure. It would be considered a `building:part=` or `indoor=`.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83909308

83907929

Should it not be `building:levels=41`, including the podium base?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83907929

83870609

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83870609

83870199

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83870199

83868859

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83868859

83868607

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83868607

83867897

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.

83867544

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83867544

83867544

It is rather acceptable to leave a name on those `landuse=` while removing `place=`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83867544

83849503

How is Nga Tsin Wai a `=neighborhood`?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83849503

83848926

1. "Central District" is different from "Central".
2. Tong Mi should be ok, and Un Chau is acceptable to me, but Om Yau and them may be debated by others.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83848926