OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
72079708

changeset/72080149

72079523

changeset/72080149

72080149

Whatever the right name tagging name is, you can't simply delete that old one. Please change the tags accordingly to preserve it.

71999827

Then don't refer to "per HK Government GeoInfo Map" as a source.

72053973

Anyway, much gratitude to mapping traffic signal codes in fact. They are kind of ignored.

72053973

You want to use a more informative changeset description (words like "test" gets flagged too). Also as in your previous changeset, use `ref`, not `name` for traffic signal codes.

72017870

We use `name` for named junctions, for example in Japan. Use `ref` for these codes.

72019067

Why would you do this?

72000186

Please don't do this.

71999827

You can't do that. Copyright violation.

71979960

What do you mean by no such trail exists? Can you assess the lifecycle status?

70645947

Can you explain why Ping Yeung Roundabout is `residential`?

71876933

changeset/71984160

71641122

You also forgot to edit this.

71641122

way/450176244

71882905

This would wrongly mean pedestrians can pass the fence. Mapping barrier entrances is the method.

71882589

Do you have any problems with tagging access?

71883519

Please don't remove tags without correcting the tagging.

71876933

There are many mistakes here. Do you have any experience with HK before?
1. A guideline in HK is that `motorway` follows Expressway area, and `trunk` follows Strategic Routes. Your edits fail to follow this principle.
2. Before Route 10 is implemented, these will not be `trunk` by virtue of road function either.
3. Shun Long Road can't possibly have two southern main lines. It's clear one is a forking bypass, and the other a reverse branch.

71847484

That doesn't sound right. It would simply mean it's `access=no`. Are you sure vehicles physically can't travel on them?