Kovoschiz's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 72079708 | ||
| 72079523 | ||
| 72080149 | Whatever the right name tagging name is, you can't simply delete that old one. Please change the tags accordingly to preserve it. |
|
| 71999827 | Then don't refer to "per HK Government GeoInfo Map" as a source. |
|
| 72053973 | Anyway, much gratitude to mapping traffic signal codes in fact. They are kind of ignored. |
|
| 72053973 | You want to use a more informative changeset description (words like "test" gets flagged too). Also as in your previous changeset, use `ref`, not `name` for traffic signal codes. |
|
| 72017870 | We use `name` for named junctions, for example in Japan. Use `ref` for these codes. |
|
| 72019067 | Why would you do this? |
|
| 72000186 | Please don't do this. |
|
| 71999827 | You can't do that. Copyright violation. |
|
| 71979960 | What do you mean by no such trail exists? Can you assess the lifecycle status? |
|
| 70645947 | Can you explain why Ping Yeung Roundabout is `residential`? |
|
| 71876933 | ||
| 71641122 | You also forgot to edit this. |
|
| 71641122 | ||
| 71882905 | This would wrongly mean pedestrians can pass the fence. Mapping barrier entrances is the method. |
|
| 71882589 | Do you have any problems with tagging access? |
|
| 71883519 | Please don't remove tags without correcting the tagging. |
|
| 71876933 | There are many mistakes here. Do you have any experience with HK before?
|
|
| 71847484 | That doesn't sound right. It would simply mean it's `access=no`. Are you sure vehicles physically can't travel on them? |