Thanks for restoring it! I fixed it in changeset/156841177

For the future, when you're using the iD editor and have a node with tags that you want to separate from a way, there's an action "Extract" in the right click menu that you can use to pull out the node without disconnecting any of the ways, and then you can just drag the intersection point back to where it's supposed to be

It looks like this had been an accidental drag, thank you for fixing it. Did you intend to also delete the bench on Lovejoy Wharf? It also looks like you didn't restore the connections between the driveway and the parking aisles
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156832359

Per imagery and https://www.nae.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Flood-Risk-Management/Massachusetts/Charles-River-Dam/, I think that northmost waterway is a fish ladder? Or, within osm terms, a fish pass

It also looks like you marked the large lock as boat:no? Is there a current closure of that lock to traffic?

Is it possible to tag this as a buffered lane? "highway=cycleway" gives the impression that this is an off street cycleway, which makes the map less useful for bicycle routing
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156037743

Those signs are particularly ambiguous. In keeping with the height limits, they're primarily targeted at trucks. I don't believe those would be understood to prohibit motorcycles, for example. Those signs also aren't in keeping with how the commonwealth prohibits bikes, horses, and pedestrians in other cases, like at entrances to I-93.

I think this is something Mass DoT aught to clarify. Note another example, where Mem Drive passes under Mass Ave: there are the same Cars Only signs, but there is no bike, ped, or horse specific signs, only a sign indicated no trucks. I would not be suprised if the "Cars Only" were not there as a legal restriction, but to remind the uhauls about storrowing

I do not know of any signage prohibiting bikes here
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155990812

This isn't signed, to the best of my knowledge. Under MA law, bikes are allowed on all roads except where explicitly prohibited, and there is no point of Mem drive or Soldiers field road that I know of that explictly prohibits bikes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155990682

Sorry, missed pasting the link: way/1310858777#map=18/42.341823/-71.102314&layers=N

Does this cycleway [1] exist? I believe it's an on street bike lane with a buffer

Hello, it looks like you used out of date imagery for the North Washington Street Bridge. You've reverted the map to the temporary alignment that has already been torn down.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155464277

This is in Medford. Are these actually Somerville addresses?

Arguably, it's not necessary to tag `foot=no` on motorways with sidewalks in the state. State law is such that on all motorways with sidewalk, pedestrians are not allowed on the motorway, and so it can be considered the default access. Generally, it's more important to tag the exceptions than the rule

On the other hand, I can understand how data consumers might have trouble with that particular law, so I'm not going to tell you to not keep adding these tags
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154915160

Looks like you may have accidentally dragged a point on way/1291328298
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154915537

Are these really oneway: alternating? I am not familiar with any such streets in the area, and these look to have fairly permanent one way infrastructure?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155045964

Did you mean to drag the edge of the water?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155120531

Oh, I guess I had gotten confused about the distinction, and had conceptualized pedestrian street as something commercial lined, or similar, but looking again at the wiki it just seems very ambiguous. Seems like a less clearly distinguished set of tiers than the highway=primary/trunk/tertiary

Note you also removed a lowered kerb, node/7886992385, which does exist. It's somewhat arguable as to whether this is an implicit unmarked crossing, because of the flush kerb, but even if you don't restore the crossing, the kerb is still something that should be mapped
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154312743

Thanks!

So they're still binker traffic lights right? Apologies if I misread your changeset, it looked like you had removed the points

Did you mean to remove the traffic lights at Main St and Mystic Valley Parkway? I'm not entirely certain if the lights there had been fully decommissioned, my memory of my ride through this weekend isn't definitive, but I thought these were controlled to some extent
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154287297