I just don't understand why you continually add in made up roads that don't follow any imagery or reality. That 106A goes through a fence on everything i can see, especially the imagery you reference. You continually create work for everyone else reviewing your edits. You do some work of value, why waste your time with made up stuff? Flagged and changed to service for the parking lot unless you can document otherwise.

Please focus on one area at a time for your updates and please just add in a short description of what you are doing to help. Your work strikes a similarity to another user that had the same issue...

Buddy, this is a giant area. Stick to smaller sections on your edits and add in some details of what it is you are doing in the description. Multiple people are trying to help you but you have yet to respond or make changes. Also you can't use google maps as a reference, that is going to lead to problems for everyone.

For the love of god buddy please stop vandalizing, adding details that don't exist, removing details that do, you are editing areas you are not familiar with at all and it helps no one.

Please stop adding in street names to alleyways and paths, it's confusing for everyone and really difficult to chase down your edits to fix. thanks

Buddy, i know you do some proper editing work but you are making such a mess adding in non existent names, paths that don't exist etc.. that other people need to go and clean up later. please stop and go back and correct your errors. If you are still a new user and are learning please stick to areas you are familiar with and know for *certain* to avoid making mistakes. thanks

Hey dude, just so there is no confusion i am updating the pathway along 112th St near Castledowns. It was redone this fall as an asphalt multiuse pathway all the way up to 171Ave along with some other paths in the area but hasn't hit the sat imagery yet.

right on, glad someone else is using the open data off COE, there is a ton of stuff on there to help.

seems okay, accidentally merged my working data and layer, but managed to salvage my work.

oops should read [St. Albert] not that anyone reads this, or cares