Yes, that's bad. The default language should be the one used in the region. If you're just learning mapping, start with small objects, not large entities.

changeset/179516863

Yes, that's bad. The default language should be the one used in the region. If you're just learning mapping, start with small objects, not large entities.

changeset/179516851

There's a big difference between highway=path and highway=footway. I specified the former, and it's not a mistake. But overall, I agree with you that it would be better if someone who can go there corrected the changes. For example, if you indicated barbed wire, map it. That would greatly help the situation.

I understand and appreciate your work. Personally, I'm only interested in the trails near the military base. Even if a trail is rarely used and not intended for public access, that's no reason to remove it. I'd be grateful if you, as someone who regularly visits this area, could accurately determine where the publicly accessible area begins and ends. Because, I repeat, all these changes arose because someone followed one of the previously designated trails (not mine) and, according to them, ended up in military territory. Then they started deleting trails. And that's not right. You can't delete trails if they're actually there.

I've sincerely tried to use satellite imagery to make corrections so that it's clear the trail passes through a military zone. That's all.

Politically motivated vandalism

changeset/179284313

There is no reason for deleting the name.

changeset/179284192

You can't delete a title just because you don't understand it.

changeset/179284142

One user was following a trail that led him to a military facility and deleted it, arguing that a road to a military facility shouldn't be accessible.

I corrected this.

He deleted it again and told me in a private message that, in addition to the trail leading to a military facility, it also led to the edge of a cliff, where he almost fell.

So I restored the trail and added cliffs.

Then another user deleted the trail anyway, claiming it wasn't there at all.

From all of this, I conclude: the trail is 100% there. But the cliffs may not be there. I added them based on someone else's description, trying to find a compromise.

There is no reason for deleting the name.

changeset/179061084

There are specific rules for mapping. If everything is as you describe, then the best solution is to mark the location of the barbed wire. And also the location of the cliff. The purpose of cartography is to record the actual state of affairs, not to remove existing trails.

I and others would be grateful if you could mark on the map the location of the barbed wire fence and the cliff.

changeset/178663515

@bigoo,
As far as I can see, @LuxuryCoop has correctly implemented the changes you suggested:
changeset/178483621
So anyway, thank you for your participation.

@LuxuryCoop,
yep, u right.

You made a huge number of mistakes in these changes and broke the roads.

changeset/178464776

hi, but its spam

changeset/178401661

1. Your changes to the map must be accompanied by comments.
2. You have not provided any justification for deleting this section.

changeset/178388049

Removal of military objects is vandalism and cannot be a reason for removing the object.

changeset/178130678

This change, while beneficial, also contains many errors and broken roads.

changeset/178120029

Vandalism Fix

changeset/177913003

Fix Vandalism

changeset/177253861

This doesn't seem like the right name for a company.