Yes maybe on the building is better

Hi,
Why did you remove the name? It's not because it's not used for the same purpose as it was build for that the name chances. Could you please add them back. Also historic names should be old_name=* you don't just delete it.

It's on top of the building, it was placed there by the gallery owner

Oh I didn't know it was 1.5 years behind (that is a lot of you ask me but that aside) Feel free to reverse it if you think that is the best option. I don't know how to add deleted buildings back

The bridge is the seamark
osm.wiki/Seamarks/Bridges

Abutment has different tagging, then a deck
bridge:support=abutment.

Thank you for telling me about the reverting thing I didn't know that. But you can tell stuff in a bit of a less aggressive tone. You always take stuff very personally

If you look on the ground there is a clear line made out of concrete that shows the beginning of the bridge

Okay thank you, I will take that into consideration in the future I will change it in this changeset

Oh yeah that is what I mean sorry if it didn't come over correctly

The way you mapped the nature reserve was not correct, you put it in a relation even though it is just a boundary (so you map the outside). Calling me names was for nothing necessarily

It doesn't, there is nowhere written they can't have a name

Het is aangepast

Hi,
Ik denk dat je gelijk hebt ik zal het direct aanpassen

Hi, yes I did that by accident I fixed it

Oh I didn't know that, thanks for the info! Also thanks for the minor fixes

I'll chance it ti old_name:fr

alright we will weave it like this and we will see when it's demolished

Yes I know

Hi,
Why did you chance the construction zone? They are demolishing the whole building

Hi, no mistake I made forgot to chance the "name" tag, i'll update it